Age Old Question: VIT vs. STR

[VargasVermillion]

So if going full STR, should you only do so if you are at the max current ilvl? If so wouldn't that mean you'd have to swap back to VIT when the next set of content comes out anyway?

[SirTaint]

So if going full STR, should you only do so if you are at the max current ilvl? If so wouldn't that mean you'd have to swap back to VIT when the next set of content comes out anyway?

Everytime the ilvl is bumped the 30 allocated stats are less useful. For progressive learning the 500hp might matter but once there is a video and strat for the battle they are no longer necessary.

ex. Going from 300 vit to 330 is a 10% gain
Going from 600 vit to 630 is a 5% gain

[VargasVermillion]

Everytime the ilvl is bumped the 30 allocated stats are less useful. For progressive learning the 500hp might matter but once there is a video and strat for the battle they are no longer necessary.

ex. Going from 300 vit to 330 is a 10% gain
Going from 600 vit to 630 is a 5% gain

Oh I see, might switch to STR at some stage then once I've gotten a little more gear. ty for the info.

[Traek]

Everytime the ilvl is bumped the 30 allocated stats are less useful. For progressive learning the 500hp might matter but once there is a video and strat for the battle they are no longer necessary.

ex. Going from 300 vit to 330 is a 10% gain
Going from 600 vit to 630 is a 5% gain

The same can be said for STR allocation. I'm not really on either side, I just don't think there is a blanket answer for this question. It depends on your gear/progress/skill/group.