Yeah, that's their loophole. I mentioned in a thread somewhere before that if people wish to abuse the vote kick, all they have to do is instigate an argument of some kind and there you go, instant GM protection for the wrong!They won't take action if the kick is result of a player dispute, but if you randomly get kicked for no reason (like several of the cases posted here) you can and should send a report. If someone goes AFK, gets kicked, comes back and continues to AFK that also can be reported, same as someone refusing to do anything unless they are kicked.
Not sure how SE write their code, but I would guess that every instance that was create, it also generate some type of ID together with it. Technically, you can tie the character ID with the instance_ID to prevent the guy who got kicked to join back to the previous session/instance.
@monochromicorn, in your situation, cant you just leave the instance and join back as different class? (since the instance you in doesn't have the full/light party , leaving instance will not give you any penalty.)
That's all the more reason for "the way it works now" to change. The OP's suggestion would help make it so that (at least more often) Vote-Kick is used for vote-kicking and Leave is used for leaving. Their rules can be more effective if they're each being used for their intended purpose.
But this thread isn't talking about adding a penalty (though some other threads have suggested it in the past). Just make it so that the person who gets kicked (justifiably or not) will be placed in a different group when they re-queue.
I do think the vote-kick system needs some major changes before any more actual penalties could be seriously considered (beyond the inherent penalty of being kicked out). But a rule that the kicked player not end up back in the group that kicked her seems helpful regardless of the validity of the kick.
No, a party that kicks for no valid reason deserves to be reported to the GMs for harassment and abuse of the vote-kick feature. They don't deserve to be trolled.
Last edited by Niwashi; 08-13-2014 at 09:39 AM.
The one thing I think most people would agree on, is if someone gets kicked for any reason (whether valid or an abuse of the system) that person shouldn't be returned to the party they were kicked from. If it was a legitimate kick- end of story. If it was a situation where people kicked others from parties to let friends join in progress as a shortcut, or to increase their odds at getting loot- while the person who got kicked doesn't deserve to lose their progress, if the people who kick for this reason are properly investigated and banned accordingly this won't be a problem for very long.
The Troll AFKer that did this I say should be reported... In my opinion.. they are making the game unenjoyable for the other 3 so if they report the person the GM can take action for abusing the system for their own personal gain......
But the people that are kicking the guy that is trolling is not kicking un fairly.. they kicking him for AFKing in the dungeon and not having the others do the work as he does not want to... that is a legit excuss to kick the person so they are not at fault for kicking him.. the guy at fault is the damn troll that keeps comming back.. Which that is harrassment or something on the lines of this...
Last edited by Sevokevo_Royuki; 08-13-2014 at 09:49 AM.
The alternative of removing the feature would be insufferable, however. Don't want to see the 2.0 leeching days again.
Just 8 hours ago had to get rid of a Scholar who refused to heal after finding out I was running the dungeon (Stone Vigil HM) on STR jewellery (You don't need 10k HP in Stone Vigil, more STR is better) and the SMN was spiritbinding i70 jewellery. After the kick, the same SCH rejoined and we had to time the second kick properly so we could get a healer from FC join in-progress. -.-
Last edited by Sove92; 08-13-2014 at 10:49 AM.
Agreed, I just can't see any changes being beneficial because it's going to upset a portion of the community anyway. As I said here:
I think SE has pretty much cut their losses with not taking action if a dispute occurs.
I actually heard of an old fc mate doing this.
He wasn't doing something right in the party I don't remember what but he was the tank. (I think a dps targeted the wrong mob ONCE he stopped tanking all together) The party vote kicked him out, he then just requed in progress and got in that party again so they were stuck with him acting like a child. I think if you were vote kicked for something like harassment you shouldn't be able to rejoin.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.