my guardian, the wyvern

[lololink]

ITT: Guy makes a fun little topic asks simple question then you have everyone is losing their friggin' minds.
It's the weekend...relax.

Yet he must kill his pet.

[Mugiawara]

Yet he must kill his pet.

We need a Beast Taming class, but if it's anything that SMN is then
I don't even know lol.

[Shougun]

Beastmaster, please look forward to it !

(If they add the wyvern to dragoon, then the job will have to be nerfed to make up for the extra dps)

[Purplenum]

We need a Beast Taming class, but if it's anything that SMN is then
I don't even know lol.

Yeah a class like Beastmaster sure would be great, but sadly this game isn't FFXI and we just can't have anything from FFXI without people getting so anally annihilated.

[Jennika]

Even if you got something like Beastmaster you'd only get like 3 pets to choose from. Each job has far too few abilities to implement something like FFXI Beastmaster. Unless(, no until!) they expand jobs and abilities we aren't going to get anything complex like that.

[Reokudo]

That's not a wyvern, it's a gods damned baby DRAGON. Wyverns don't have arms.

[Neri]

You know, when squeenix showed off a picture of af2 along time ago for drg, it was labeled dragon knight. My first thought was why don't they make lancer branch off into a dragon knight that fights alongside dragons instead of against them? Win win yo

I guess because Dragoon in Japan is called Ryuukishi. Ryuu as in dragon, and Kishi as in knight hence Dragon Knight, I suppose~. The term was changed to Dragoon in the translation?

[Pandastirfry]

ITT: Guy makes a fun little topic asks simple question then you have everyone is losing their friggin' minds.
It's the weekend...relax.

It's more a case of..

ITT: guy makes post that has been brought up at least monthly since jobs were announced in 1.0, majority of player base sick of hearing it and wishes the desperate hold outs would let this poor horse rest in peace, you couldn't even make a thimble of glue out of what's left from all the beating.

[Ryel]

It's more a case of..

ITT: guy makes post that has been brought up at least monthly since jobs were announced in 1.0, majority of player base sick of hearing it and wishes the desperate hold outs would let this poor horse rest in peace, you couldn't even make a thimble of glue out of what's left from all the beating.

I really wish people would stop using the word "Majority" until they can provide evidence of this claim.

I don't recall an official poll asking whether or not the Dragoon job should have a pet or not with results that can be posted to back this up. If you wanted to be honest then simply say that you personally are tired of hearing of it and be done with it.

[Pandastirfry]

I really wish people would stop using the word "Majority" until they can provide evidence of this claim.

I don't recall an official poll asking whether or not the Dragoon job should have a pet or not with results that can be posted to back this up. If you wanted to be honest then simply say that you personally are tired of hearing of it and be done with it.

There was no "offical" poll, but there was in the 1.0 forums an "unofficial " poll thread with "No" winning by a wide margin, as well as the dev s flat saying a long time ago not only that it ain't going to happen but also explaining why. (Basically they said, it was either gimp the players actual damage to add the pet, or let the dragoon be powerful. They went with the latter)

The topic has been settled, let it die.