How "Vote to Dismiss" is designed encourages abuse.

[Quesse]

The real problem is instant gratification and duty finder.

Its a vicious circle. In 1.0 there was no duty finder and no need for vote kick. But everyone wants instant pairing for duty with no community and then complained there was no vote kick. Now there's a vote kick and everyone is complaining that its being abused.

Its being abused because Duty Finder killed community. Everyone happy now?

[Hewenttojared]

The real problem is instant gratification and duty finder.

Its a vicious circle. In 1.0 there was no duty finder and no need for vote kick. But everyone wants instant pairing for duty with no community and then complained there was no vote kick. Now there's a vote kick and everyone is complaining that its being abused.

Its being abused because Duty Finder killed community. Everyone happy now?

I actually think it would be pretty cool if they tried out a couple of servers without duty finder. I would move to it...

[Tolmos]

I actually think it would be pretty cool if they tried out a couple of servers without duty finder. I would move to it...

I would love it if they did this. I, of course, would never go to any of those servers, but it would create options for those who do want to. They should either offer free transfers to those servers, OR choose large servers and offer free transfers off for those of us who aren't interested.

Of course, there might be crying about not enough people wanting to play on some server or another, but that would really be a great testimony to whether people want or don't want the system.