Hunts: There is no problem with design.

[Worm]

The players surely will not stop converging on this particular bit of content so SE would be required to make the adjustment...

It's almost like you think the players are the ones who put end game raid gear on the vendor.

[Daniolaut]

Sands being on a vendor with virtually no cap makes the 1-2 sands from second coil a week shared between 8 people feel really silly.

It's almost like you think the players are the ones who put end game raid gear on the vendor.

So... what both of you are saying.. is...

The design is F#@%ing amazing since it has great rewards, and no cap, just wayyyyy too many people are doing it..
'
hmmm i see now...

/mypointproven.

Actually no.

The rewards design is flawed considering these items are on weekly lockouts in content that actually requires more brainpower than clicking on a <pos> and hitting it once while being in a party.

The lockouts should be removed or drops increased for the other content.

No the real solution would be to remove the option to buy oils and sands from the merchant.

Square-Enix should continue catering to the players who actually play the game, such as myself and many others who dont rant the forums continuously and, instead, play the game regularly.

Instead of casual players who only play for endgame gear, such as possibly yourself and the other "big dogs" as Worm put it, on the forums.

[Vaer]

So... what both of you are saying.. is...

The design is F#@%ing amazing since it has great rewards, and no cap, just wayyyyy too many people are doing it..
'
hmmm i see now...

/mypointproven.

Actually no.

The rewards design is flawed considering these items are on weekly lockouts in content that actually requires more brainpower than clicking on a <pos> and hitting it once while being in a party.

The lockouts should be removed or drops increased for the other content.