
Originally Posted by
giantslayer
Abuse is definitely a concern, and there are safeguards that should be in place to address that:
1. Make it take a decent amount of reports to auto lock someone and don't tell players how many it takes. If it takes 30, then a few angry jerks can't freeze someone, but it would still be easy for real spammers to get locked. They send hundreds, if not thousands, of spams a minute, and with reporting being easy, you can get hundreds of reports in a matter of seconds.
2. The reports should contain the text of the reported message and who submitted the report, so a Square rep could review and tell if it was a false charge. The Square rep could then take disciplinary action against the people making false reports. For every case like that warranting manual review, there will be thousands of legit spammers reported.
IRL, I work in banking. With millions of transactions posting on people's accounts every day, virtually none of those transactions get manually reviewed unless the account holder initiates a dispute. Same principal here. When you are dealing with high accuracy and high volumes (we will be talking hundreds of thousands to millions of RMT reports if they implement an easy method), it is important to make human review the exception, which can be initiated upon request by the customer.
Also keep in mind that each report submitted has already been reviewed by a human player. If 30 people report someone for RMT, the only way they are wrong is if it is coordinated malicious player behavior, and Square can step in to review after a frozen player makes that claim, rather than sifting through thousands of reports to find a handful of bad ones.
On a side note, it would actually be good to have the link to report stuff like harassment through a similar system so that it reports their exact text, not just what the person reporting types up. Harassment would still have a manual review, rather than the freeze at x number, because those are a very different type of situation (and also much much less common).