Kitru's argument, or at the very least the impression I got from his word choice, was that a WHM doesn't gain regen with Piety while scholars do. That is patently false. A WHM doesn't gain as much from Piety, but even a SCH gets more regen from base ticks than they do from aetherflow. He then further argued that scholars can use piety for throughput as opposed to regen. This I agree with; I haven't done the math to determine whether it's mathematically a sound option compared to det/crit, but even if not optimal, it's a way to use excess of the stat (until you are regenning to the point where you literally cannot spend as much mp as you have coming in. The part I disagree with is that Piety is worthless as a WHM for throughput. It's not as powerful, certainly, but WHM can still use it for throughput too - if their regen allows it, they can replace a few Cures with Cure2s instead of spamming Cure praying for Freecast. Or they can throw out DoTs. Finally, as Kitru alluded to in an earlier post, Piety doesn't affect the throughput OR longevity of Eos, Selene, or Lustrate. The only healing spell a WHM has that isn't affected by Piety is Benediction, a much smaller percentage of WHM healing than Lustrate or the faeries are for a SCH.


Reply With Quote

Someone calculated, that the break even point for permanent cure1 without running oom is at round about 5000MP.




