Least played job?

[lxSch]

1.So wait a minute, you're pulling the double standard on me by accusing me of "misinterpreting" his post, when he clearly misinterpreted the post before his. Or am I mistaken in assuming that people know how to play and equate pre-casting to timing with the beginning of an ability. Looks like everybody on this page is guilty of "misinterpreting".

2.And again Ix, what is up with you assuming that succor is the only thing we think is in the scholar utility pool, where did we say that, because I don't think ANY of us even hinted at that.

1. I do not consider someone bad or good by the way they do things - only by results they get in the end. I will not consider someone good if they do some commonly accepted things, neither i will consider someone bad for not doing them. Experienced players follow the tactic of the "minimal effort" - they will not do something unless it is absolutely necessary for the win. I hope my point is understandable.

2. I did not say or mean that, it was not meant for advanced players but beginners.

[Alistaire]

1. I do not consider someone bad or good by the way they do things - only by results they get in the end. I will not consider someone good if they do some commonly accepted things, neither i will consider someone bad for not doing them. Experienced players follow the tactic of the "minimal effort" - they will not do something unless it is absolutely necessary for the win. I hope my point is understandable.

That is quite possibly the worst statement in the history of statements. Things become commonly accepted things for a reason, others don't, also for good reasons.

And people don't do or not do things "unless absolutely necessary", there's varying degrees of "what works best" without having to do or not do any particular thing in a particular circumstance.

[lxSch]

That is quite possibly the worst statement in the history of statements. Things become commonly accepted things for a reason, others don't, also for good reasons.

And people don't do or not do things "unless absolutely necessary", there's varying degrees of "what works best" without having to do or not do any particular thing in a particular circumstance.

I wonder what reasons could possibly be behind rejecting something that works well but is not popular. You did a statement but without any ground for it.

if you had stop at #17 when 3 ppl said you are a bad SCH, you can advoide get burn

I agree that trying to reason with people who are lacking enough perception to grasp a certain concept is pointless, but i found out later a big misunderstanding have taken a place, and hopefully everyone understood each other.
I will keep my thoughts for myself then.