Why I don't like the idea of paying for extra retainers.

[saber_alter]

This is what legacy players actually believe.

its a half truth. I'm sure quite a few ideas that 1.0 players came up with have made it into the game.

however, dropping dalamud onto eorzea was ultimately square's decision alone.

[Eriatarka12]

its a half truth. I'm sure quite a few ideas that 1.0 players came up with have made it into the game.

however, dropping dalamud onto eorzea was ultimately square's decision alone.

They were going to re-make the game to attempt to regain lost profits and salavage their reputation no matter what. This delusion that some legacy players have that they are the only reason 2.0 exists is ridiculous and an illusion to make themselves feel more important.

[Mandudez]

They were going to re-make the game to attempt to regain lost profits and salavage their reputation no matter what. This delusion that some legacy players have that they are the only reason 2.0 exists is ridiculous and an illusion to make themselves feel more important.

So we have the legacy players to thank for the monthly charge for extra retainers by their logic.

[Merle]

They were going to re-make the game to attempt to regain lost profits and salavage their reputation no matter what. This delusion that some legacy players have that they are the only reason 2.0 exists is ridiculous and an illusion to make themselves feel more important.

I'm not gonna say legacy players are "the only reason", but is truth that we wouldn't have 2.0 if legacy players hadn't paid. On January 2012 Yoshida said that they couldn't afford to design/implement 2.0 for free anymore and because of that they had to charge for 1.0 (with a smaller fee as compensation). So yeah, is not the only reason, but without legacy players paying for 1.0 we wouldn't have 2.0