So should gear only drop from 40 person raids too? I don't see why people like yourself are getting hysterical over semantics.I think the point of the OP is that they're growing in scale too fast. I'm not quite sure whether it's because of XIV's stat weights vs WoW's, but comparing what we see here with what was seen in vanilla WoW:
Tier 1 sets were ilevel 66 (in a game where the level cap was lv60)
Tier 2 sets were ilevel 76
Tier 3 sets were ilevel 92
Non-tier pieces could range from item level 60-63 as far as dungeon drops went.
WoW jumped 32 item levels between the level cap and the top gear in the game at that point in time (even then, not many saw tier 3 gear because the expansion came out afterwards, and the gear from said expansion easily made tier 3 gear obsolete). By comparison FFXIV has jumped 40 item levels between launch and the first content patch. Second content patch is making that a 65 item level jump.



No, but progression could have been controlled a little better, IMO.
I'm not getting hysterical, just mentioning something for the sake of giving a frame of reference. Something I neglected to mention is that despite the big gaps in item level, the stat gaps aren't very notable. It does give a bad impression when the item level is jumping by what seems to be a large amount (without context the jump from 50 of something to 90 of something is large no matter how you slice it), specially so close to the game's launch.I don't see why people like yourself are getting hysterical over semantics.
* The sad thing is that FFXIV turned RDM into a turret, and people think that's what it's supposed to be. It's supposed to combine sword and magic into something more, not spend the bulk of gameplay spamming spells and jump into melee for only 3 GCDs before scurrying back to the back line like good little casters.
* Design ideas:
Red Mage - COMPLETE (https://tinyurl.com/y6tsbnjh), Chemist - Second Pass (https://tinyurl.com/ssuog88), Thief - First Pass (https://tinyurl.com/vdjpkoa), Rune Fencer - First Pass (https://tinyurl.com/y3fomdp2)
No, but progression could have been controlled a little better, IMO.
I'm not getting hysterical, just mentioning something for the sake of giving a frame of reference. Something I neglected to mention is that despite the big gaps in item level, the stat gaps aren't very notable. It does give a bad impression when the item level is jumping by what seems to be a large amount (without context the jump from 50 of something to 90 of something is large no matter how you slice it), specially so close to the game's launch.
As Craiger said, since iLvs only increase in increments of 5 at the smallest post-cap, if from the start they had just made it say iLv60 => iLv62 instead of iLv60 => iLv70 with all the stats being the same it'd be fine? You're freaking out over semantics. If items didn't have an "item level" label on them and just the stats, you wouldn't notice or care. Are people really so starved for controversy and drama?
Last edited by BlueMage; 03-22-2014 at 06:01 PM.



* The sad thing is that FFXIV turned RDM into a turret, and people think that's what it's supposed to be. It's supposed to combine sword and magic into something more, not spend the bulk of gameplay spamming spells and jump into melee for only 3 GCDs before scurrying back to the back line like good little casters.
* Design ideas:
Red Mage - COMPLETE (https://tinyurl.com/y6tsbnjh), Chemist - Second Pass (https://tinyurl.com/ssuog88), Thief - First Pass (https://tinyurl.com/vdjpkoa), Rune Fencer - First Pass (https://tinyurl.com/y3fomdp2)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote

