Yes, RMT aside. The problems with RMTs should not dictate development. Anything designed in game needs to exclude RMTs as an extrinsic variable. RMTs just need dealt with, period.
4-1: They would still need cooldowns, this is inarguable to the point. Even if i90 gear had 4 available melds, they would need to use cds.
4-2: Saying “facerolling content” is an overstatement.
4-3: Those party restrictions already exist.
4-a-1: These are indeed flaws. Even if some of these things are intended, they are still flaws. Just because something isn't a glitch doesn't mean it's not a flaw. Without further discussion, they are subjective, but almost any flaw is subjective (the cannon of beauty exemplifies this).
Again, this is a simple fix I seen mentioned before, that accepts RNG as a way of life, doesn’t create anything overpowered, stimulates the economy, and creates the horizontal progression a lot of players want.
Regardless, my agenda is fulfilled…there IS plenty to talk about yet.
