
That would be the smart way to do it rightWhy cant they make it so if you click abandon you get booted if you don't you stay in the instance and wait for more party members... Wait that would be logical, cause some of us don't mind waiting 5 minutes rather than running something for 45 minutes all over again...
It being possible to clear the instance with the party and voting to disband is not abuse; I don't see how you could say it isIt is abuse actually. I have seen this setup before in CT, and all you have to do is ask the alliance to trade a few ranged for a few melee. Cant tell me that the entire alliance was melee heavy, cause I have never seen that. Plus, in this case, the other 16 people are screwed as well, cause an entire group left.
this, having other people in the group dictate you getting kicked out is silly, especially when 'replenish ranks' feature exists. I have to give SE a bad grade for this implementation.Why cant they make it so if you click abandon you get booted if you don't you stay in the instance and wait for more party members... Wait that would be logical, cause some of us don't mind waiting 5 minutes rather than running something for 45 minutes all over again...



For a 4-man party it takes a 75% vote (Initiator +2 so 3/4)While I disagree that is has to go all together, the 50% vote needed is BS. Should be at least a 75% or so majority. Basically two people can go together into a dungeon with the intent of kicking everyone just before the last boss and there's nothing that can be done about it.
For a 8-man party it takes a 62.5% vote (Initiator +4 so 5/8)
For a 24-man Alliance I think it should take Initiator +12 or 54.17%
That is my opinion.
This sounds like the exact situation Vote Abandon was created for. What exactly are you crying about?
Had you guys have been smarter, you could have swapped one or two of those melee throughout the whole alliance and got the clear. Who said you have to tackle atomos in only your groups?


They need to take it a step further and allow us to vote out other alliances.
Just had a ridiculous session of CT where Group C was trolling us on Atomos over and over by backing out of the fight as the rest of us went in to MPK us.
Reported all of them for harassment.



people are abusing this and its only been out one day :/.
been in some great titan ex df parties where we reached and killed heart, thats pretty decent if we kept on going im sure we'd get closer and closer to winning.
but of course after like 2 tries the whole party is kicked.
wasting my food seriously lol.
LNC ~60~ DRG CON ~60~ WHM ARC ~60~ BRD MRD ~60~ WAR THM ~60~ BLM ACN ~60~ SMN ~ SCH ROG ~60~ NIN
FFXI - Elia 2007 -★- 2010 FFXI ~ 2002 -☆- 2007FFXIV - Xaimera Zeal ★ 2010 -☆- 2017
◕‿‿◕



People need to stop saying "you guys wanted it and now you complain once its implemented".
Because those who wanted it isn't necessarily the same people as those complaining now.
And I agree that those who voted No should stay for replacements.
“There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.”
― Ernest Hemingway

Agreed that those that don't want to abandon should stay.
Although to be fair, people have gone "please kick me" since Vote Kick has been around.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



