There shouldn't be a Myth cap because.....

[ApolloGenX]

Sorry, you're just wrong.

Few games would release with 1 end game raid zone. Even WoW had more than that way back when- Eq, too.

Secondly, this is not a brand new game. Like it or not, it's year 3, and while they did an amazing job translating the game into a workable format, it is still 3 years into it. Also- If they created this entire game in about a year- WTH happened to the development speed?? It's been 4 months- they could have developed almost half a new game by now... so why such little content?

They need to stop rehashing primals and release new content. Unfortunately, while the translations of old stuff have been fantastic, the new stuff has been subpar.

[Whiz]

Sorry, you're just wrong.

Few games would release with 1 end game raid zone. Even WoW had more than that way back when- Eq, too.

Secondly, this is not a brand new game. Like it or not, it's year 3, and while they did an amazing job translating the game into a workable format, it is still 3 years into it. Also- If they created this entire game in about a year- WTH happened to the development speed?? It's been 4 months- they could have developed almost half a new game by now... so why such little content?

They need to stop rehashing primals and release new content. Unfortunately, while the translations of old stuff have been fantastic, the new stuff has been subpar.

AAR is a brand new game FF14 1.23 wasn't and it was completely scrapped.

[ApolloGenX]

AAR is a brand new game FF14 1.23 wasn't and it was completely scrapped.

There are two schools of thought on this.

If I agree with you- then you must agree with me- They created this new game very quickly... a year or so.. and so there is really no reason why we haven't seen more development in 4 months. It only took a year to create the game!

Completely ignoring most of the game and ONLY looking at instances... we shouldbe getting at LEAST 1 a month or so- new not rehashed, based on the previous speed of development.

[NeruMew]

There are two schools of thought on this.

If I agree with you- then you must agree with me- They created this new game very quickly... a year or so.. and so there is really no reason why we haven't seen more development in 4 months. It only took a year to create the game!

Completely ignoring most of the game and ONLY looking at instances... we shouldbe getting at LEAST 1 a month or so- new not rehashed, based on the previous speed of development.

Yeah... why we no have no moar content if they can like... create a whole instanced world in 12 months, but can't add more than 1 new (ok we can say 2 and a half) new instances over 4 monhts! QQ

Need moar content to nom nom pac man style nom through!

Meh... We all know they did not create it from 0 and reused a lot. And it was ongoing for more than 1 year, right?

[ApolloGenX]

Yeah... why we no have no moar content if they can like... create a whole instanced world in 12 months, but can't add more than 1 new (ok we can say 2 and a half) new instances over 4 monhts! QQ

Need moar content to nom nom pac man style nom through!

Meh... We all know they did not create it from 0 and reused a lot. And it was ongoing for more than 1 year, right?

That was the point of my original post- they recoded a pre-existing game... so it isn't really a brand new game- it's a new implementation of a 3 year old game.

I am not sure what you are talking about eating through content. I am incredibly casual. I play maybe once or twice a week, if I even play. I go some weeks without logging in. There is just so little to do at end game here, that I can get my timers on Monday and not log in for a week. I don't grind tomes- I am casual and don't want to spend my free time running mindless dungeons over and over.

So if it's brand new- they should be putting stuff out faster based on history. If it's a three year game, then stop with the "the game just came out junk". -Just stop making excuses in general. Excuses admit that there is a problem and try to justify it- but it doesn't deny the problem. Stop telling people why it's okay that end game is bad.

[Rex]

That was the point of my original post- they recoded a pre-existing game... so it isn't really a brand new game- it's a new implementation of a 3 year old game.

That would be a big FALSE...

[ApolloGenX]

That would be a big FALSE...

Okay, well you say false, the other poster says true- It doesn't matter. I have explained why it doesn't matter. Either new and they should be developing faster... or not new and no excuse for such little content. Take your pick.

[Amyas]

That was the point of my original post- they recoded a pre-existing game... so it isn't really a brand new game- it's a new implementation of a 3 year old game.

You're wrong, and you'd realize that if you played 1.x

2.0 is a brand new game, all the mechanics are new, land scape, everything... come on. And new games need to be maintained, not just have half-baked 'content' stuffed in to please people who do a dungeon once and say 'DONE! Oh there's no more to do? NO CONTENT!'

[ApolloGenX]

You're wrong, and you'd realize that if you played 1.x

2.0 is a brand new game, all the mechanics are new, land scape, everything... come on.

I played 1.0 and 1.23- it was total garbage. So, see my point about if this is a new game (Which I tend to agree, actually. The development on this game to get it to market was insane.)

[Whiz]

Sorry, you're just wrong.

Few games would release with 1 end game raid zone. Even WoW had more than that way back when- Eq, too.

FF11 (original Japan release) 1 raid dynamis / DCUO 1 raid on launch/ Rift 1 20man 1 10man(after 1st update)/ FF14 0/ SWTOR 1 / GW2 0/ Marvel heros 1 the list goes on....


p.s. all these raids were gated all but FF11 had weekly lock outs like AAR. FF11 had a 72 hr lock out.