People who say Blizzard 2 was not good in our AOE rotations have no clue what they're talking about.
People who say Blizzard 2 was not good in our AOE rotations have no clue what they're talking about.
No one is even saying that.
This thread got pointlessly derailed into a discussion on Blizzard II spam.
People are only saying that Blizzard II was never the center point of any decent damage rotation.
The best rotation (pre 2.1) was
Fire III > Flare > Transpose > Blizzard II > Blizzard II
But that rotation would still be considered based on Flare rather than Blizzard II.
Freeze plays the same role as Blizzard II.
Unfortunately that rotation was still also based on the getting a second reduced cast time which they have fixed.
That's a completely different issue though.
I remember someone calculating that that rotation was still just a tiny bit better than F2 spam -> Flare even if you didn't get the hasted Flare after F3. Like few per cent or so.
Yoshi-P is doing his best and is patching Endwalker. Please wait warmly until it is ready.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.