Quote Originally Posted by EasymodeX View Post
Well, I only spent 20 minutes poking at various approaches, but that seems like a "winner for now" -- honestly not much different than a pre-2.1 approach. On the side, there's actually another significantly more convoluted timing for TD/FR that gets +0.1 more PPS, but it's not even worth typing.
That's why i said "most sensible" It's not the most damaging one, but the one that makes most sense.

Quote Originally Posted by EasymodeX View Post
If you use TD every time it drops immediately, and you only use 1 off-cycle attack (FR) for DK-cycles (2 sets) -- in other words, for DK-cycles where you DON'T use TD, you use FR instead, then you can gain the +0.1 more PPS. #notworth.

This basically requires that you track how many attacks you are using within a DK cycle, and you can't just use the off-cycle attack at the same time in the cycle (e.g. "right before DK") -- you need to stagger it earlier and earlier until you get a TD span overlap that allows a FR, and then you need to make sure you don't use 2 off-cycle attacks between DKs. It's kind of only reasonable on paper.
That's not what i meant. What if you just apply TD immediately when it runs out and ignore FR completely. You calculated it for just using 1 TD every 6 cycles, but TD should run out every 5 cycles (assuming your global cooldown is 2 seconds).