ITT: We learn that 1-99% ≠ 100%
![]()
ITT: We learn that 1-99% ≠ 100%
![]()
Just to reiterate what I said above:
Just because you missed once, twice, or even 3+ times in a row at 99% does not mean the game is lying and that the chance for success isn't really 99% as it claims. "A couple times" is such a miniscule sample size that there's no way you could ever possibly hope to get an accurate %. You'll need to mine 10s of thousands of times to even begin getting an accurate measurement.
I'd be willing to bet that if you mined 1,000,000 ore at 99%, that you'd end up with roughly 990,000 ore while also getting huge strings of failures in the middle somewhere. Even if you missed 100 times in a row at some point, your success rate would still be 99% in the end.
This kind of reminds me of ye olde FFXI, back when people would claim things like "SAM WS have terrible accuracy, I always miss!". They'd swear something like a 20% acc rate, until they were parsed and they turned out to be capped at 95% the entire time.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.