Results 1 to 10 of 24

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    305
    With Feather FI i always evaded an attack before the timer ran out. Feather FII i always evaded an attack before the timer ran out. So i don't see any reason their different. FFII should evade 2 attacks for PUG only. You could even have it Evade one physical attack and one Magic attack. That would give some uniqueness to the class. But wait people will start complaining no not another Blink tank. but hay I'm OK with that. So far their isn't an action that can Evade a magic attack and i think this would be a great addition to the job.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Frebaut View Post
    With Feather FI i always evaded an attack before the timer ran out. Feather FII i always evaded an attack before the timer ran out. So i don't see any reason their different. FFII should evade 2 attacks for PUG only. You could even have it Evade one physical attack and one Magic attack. That would give some uniqueness to the class. But wait people will start complaining no not another Blink tank. but hay I'm OK with that. So far their isn't an action that can Evade a magic attack and i think this would be a great addition to the job.
    That's exactly what I'm trying to say. It doesn't matter which has a higher chance to evade because you both only get one evade, and it's never a problem getting that one evade before the timer runs out. So what if it takes the enemy 1 swing instead of 2? The outcome of both abilities is still the same.
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    327
    Quote Originally Posted by Pon_Patapon View Post
    That's exactly what I'm trying to say. It doesn't matter which has a higher chance to evade because you both only get one evade, and it's never a problem getting that one evade before the timer runs out. So what if it takes the enemy 1 swing instead of 2? The outcome of both abilities is still the same.
    Peiste NM is a good place to see why, when your dpsing and you need to evade that AOE, you don't want to be thinking, well i'll just evade the next one, which might not even come in that 30 sec window (^_~)
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Akuun View Post
    Peiste NM is a good place to see why, when your dpsing and you need to evade that AOE, you don't want to be thinking, well i'll just evade the next one, which might not even come in that 30 sec window (^_~)
    Actually I've killed the Peiste NM a dozen times, and I know that the AOE is rarely avoidable, even with FeatherFoot II. I only evade it about 25% of the time it's occurred with FFII up. So your argument makes no sense. It's still an unpredictable chance to evade within the duration of the ability regardless of what your chance is. Even with FFII, you can't guarantee when you're going to evade. So how does that make it all that much better than FFI?
    (0)

  5. #5
    Player

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    327
    Quote Originally Posted by Pon_Patapon View Post
    Actually I've killed the Peiste NM a dozen times, and I know that the AOE is rarely avoidable, even with FeatherFoot II. I only evade it about 25% of the time it's occurred with FFII up. So your argument makes no sense. It's still an unpredictable chance to evade within the duration of the ability regardless of what your chance is. Even with FFII, you can't guarantee when you're going to evade. So how does that make it all that much better than FFI?
    Maybe I just have better gear and stats for evading it, but FFI doesn't evade it as much.
    Your continued argument really doesn't make sense., if your chance to evade is higher how is it better, how is it not?
    (0)