Results -9 to 0 of 196

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Welsper59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,427
    Character
    Eros Maxima
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Maxthunder View Post
    Again this isnt a NEW game it is a RE-RELEASE of a failed game. They used the majority of the 1.0 content for 2.0 and didnt add very much new content. If this was a completely new game everything content wise would be brand spanking new but it is not it is rehashed content from 1.0. Regardless of who is the lead dev or not they are useing designs from 1.0 as well as content that had not been released in 1.0.
    I'm willing to bet that you'd consider something that re-used ~30% of the old, as something that is not new. That's sort of where we're at now that's why. Changes to re-released content are significant (mostly), and everything else is just new in general. But I guess that doesn't qualify for anything.

    Maybe the fact that the area names and terms are the same that it sorta feels like it's just an old game. There's a lot of that going on, so I guess if you consider things like generic names/text to be equal to combat/system changes, newly designed areas, new quests, a new class, significantly new content in upcoming patches, etc, then yeah... "majority" of ARR is old content.
    (2)
    Last edited by Welsper59; 10-31-2013 at 05:30 AM.