Update on DirectX 11 client?

[MageBlack]

1.0 may have had better textures and more player animations but the world was bland and uninteresting. It was how they justified the copy paste terrain and animation lock. just a personal preference, I'll take 2.0's combat speed, gorgeous world, beautiful lighting, and the ability to jump, over 1.0 any day. then again, some people will never be happy no matter what we have...

[misterrpg]

1.0 may have had better textures and more player animations but the world was bland and uninteresting. It was how they justified the copy paste terrain and animation lock. just a personal preference, I'll take 2.0's combat speed, gorgeous world, beautiful lighting, and the ability to jump, over 1.0 any day. then again, some people will never be happy no matter what we have...

I love how if anyone says 1.0 was better in ANY way, then we are classified as "trolls". Ugh, you're disgusting. Many people firmly believe that 1.0 was a better game, period.

[Mavlok]

I love how if anyone says 1.0 was better in ANY way, then we are classified as "trolls". Ugh, you're disgusting. Many people firmly believe that 1.0 was a better game, period.

Apparently not too many, since it flopped and ARR succeeded.

[Bufkus]

I love how if anyone says 1.0 was better in ANY way, then we are classified as "trolls". Ugh, you're disgusting. Many people firmly believe that 1.0 was a better game, period.

I think you should replace Many people with "I am the only person"

[KuroNoKaze]

then again, some people will never be happy no matter what we have...

Maybe different people just have different tastes?

I'll take 2.0's combat speed, gorgeous world, beautiful lighting, and the ability to jump, over 1.0 any day. then again, some people will never be happy no matter what we have...

Mh. I'll take the combat system and animations (including animation lock) from 1.23, the zone size and no loading screens from 1.x coupled with the zone design from ARR, the story from 1.x and the UI from ARR. To go, please.