Free Company Capacity - Insufficient Resources to Complete this Action

[Magus42]

or should they increase the cap all around for everyone even tho hardly more than a handful or 2 of FC reach the first cap?

Why shouldn't they? It's not like raising the cap will in any way harm guilds that don't reach it, nor would it cause any added strain on the server if nobody else ever makes use of it.

[HunkyJimpjorps]

What SE can do that would be beneficial 2 ways ( players happy, gil gone from economy ) is just like player housing is supposed to be from what I hear, small house, bug house, uber house or some crap like that.. is to make it possible for a rank 5 company to be able to purchase FC member limit cap increases. This can be a considerable sum, and if your needing it apparently you have a lot of members so can come up with this sum. say, 512 no upgrade, upgrade 1 +100 , upgrade 2 +200 , upgrade 3+ 300 , and one final upgrade putting your FC limit at 1500 people. AND these limits have to be purchased in ORDER, so if you want final you must buy the first 3.

Does this sound reasonable?

Yeah, that'd be perfect. Lord knows we could use something to spend our six million company credits on.

[Nymeri]

Also, still no in game proof as to how many people have been unactive for 3+ weeks.

We have a big FC, that is a fact. You can log onto our server and step into any zone to see how many people with PBC and DK tags there are, there will most likley be several. We have hundreds of active members, and would love to be able to communicate with them all at once, without having to be broken up into smaller segments.

I fail to see your infatuation with "proof" of our active numbers. It really isn't necessary to feed your trolling by giving you rosters/member addresses/email accounts/passwords/ or whatever whimsy you might need to verify member activity.

Half of the posts in this thread are yours, --all attacking our FC for some unknown reason. Please try to remember the purpose of this thread: discussing FC limits. This is not an "attack people with more friends than you" thread.

[Obysuca]

I had to go to page 3 of 3 just to find someone who'd been offline more then 4 days, so... any ideas that we're primarily made up of people who never log in are just patently false.

Scroll down to the very bottom and I'm sure you'll find people off for weeks. Based on your scroll bar, that's not very far down

[Jellybeans]

EDIT: Yeah but that is the 3rd page, so at least 340 members have been on in the last week.

You see if Free Company sizes are made larger it will negatively impact my/the communities playing experience because _________________.

[Zezlar]

I can only imagine the drama and nightmares that must exist in FCs that large.

[Selic]

Does this sound reasonable? or should they increase the cap all around for everyone even tho hardly more than a handful or 2 of FC reach the first cap?

It's pretty reasonable IMO, with the main thing being that it's not an immediate solution but I don't think anyone honestly expects one.

[Magus42]

Scroll down to the very bottom and I'm sure you'll find people off for weeks. Based on your scroll bar, that's not very far down

See BotenAnna's image for the lower end, and even then, that's on PAGE THREE OUT OF THREE - meaning over 2/3rds of the guild has been on within the last week, therefore your argument about "most of the guild hasn't been on in weeks" is false. End of story.

[Swishytail]

I had to go to page 3 of 3 just to find someone who'd been offline more then 4 days, so... any ideas that we're primarily made up of people who never log in are just patently false.

Each Page = 170 members.
You are at the TOP of page 3.
Minimum 170 members have been inactive for 4+ days.
This does not include however many were at the bottom of page 2.

[Magus42]

Each Page = 170 members.
You are at the TOP of page 3.
Minimum 170 members have been inactive for 4+ days.
This does not include however many were at the bottom of page 2.

See BotenAnna's image for more of page 3.

The point was not "we have no members at all inactive over 2 weeks" but that "the majority of the guild has been active before then" which has been proven. Well over 2/3rds of the guild has been active in the last week.