Behest Issues After April Update

[sketch]

And its funny how people like you can't get it through their thick skull that if everyone else is flocking over to one camp, it doesn't matter that there's other camps because its not a hot spot.

behests should be killed off anyhow. they were terrible before the changes started and still are now.

[Peregrine]

It's an imperfusion of other zones problem. Nanawa is the 2nd most populated city in the game. Like ulda, it is the best r30 dungeon.

[MonsieurVerde]

It's an imperfusion of other zones problem. Nanawa is the 2nd most populated city in the game. Like ulda, it is the best r30 dungeon.

"Best" is subjective.

[Azureos]

haha i really think behest the way they are now are going to be a problem in the future cause even if peoples dispatch equally on the other areas the matter is that a server for a rank 10 behest (as an example) can only welcome 24 players . same for rank 20 and so on ... lol you can imagine that if there are problems for players to get into behest while all servers are empty it sure will be tough if "one day" (lol) a lot of people play to ff14 ...

[Mack]

behests should be killed off anyhow. they were terrible before the changes started and still are now.

I agree, but considering there isn't much to do in the game now I'll take them, but I hope they fix them, make them fun and engaging and make them accessible down the road or get rid of them altogether. They look like a last minute addition to the game before the release deadline to me...nothing good about them other than SP.

[darkstarpoet1]

What flaw? The flaw that everyone has hoard around the same camp? If you want to "Play the game" Go to a different camp. They give you Anima for a reason.

Don't cry foul just because you couldn't get in to the behest with thirty other people trying when there are five other camps to try at higher levels.

the flaw is the fact that the best sp areas are all together. the flaw is the fact that people are there because of the best rewards are there. the flaw is there and easy to see if people just open their eyes.

[MonsieurVerde]

the flaw is the fact that the best sp areas are all together. the flaw is the fact that people are there because of the best rewards are there. the flaw is there and easy to see if people just open their eyes.

Once again "Best" is subjective. Unless we have quantifiable evidence this entire debacle is all subjective.

[darkstarpoet1]

Once again "Best" is subjective. Unless we have quantifiable evidence this entire debacle is all subjective.

no best sp is not subjective. if you get more sp at one camp than the other camp then it is fact not opinion. you can go run whatever leve you want at the 40 camp in limsa or grid and i will put reveries or dunes against any of them in the amount of sp. in a sp = rank game the camp with better sp will be where people go.

[Mack]

Once again "Best" is subjective. Unless we have quantifiable evidence this entire debacle is all subjective.

How is it subjective in this case? please do explain...because from where everyone else is sitting the best SP areas depend on the best leves you can abandon and redo, and how easy those leves are and how accessible it is linking them (meaning where there are more people and most likely where most people will do behest). The best SP areas are therefore the most populated areas such as Horizon, Nanawa and in some cases Bloodshore (heck even Casseopia isn't populated). That's it. Period. Meaning I cannot convince even my dad to join me on Behest in Gridania.

[MonsieurVerde]

no best sp is not subjective. if you get more sp at one camp than the other camp then it is fact not opinion. you can go run whatever leve you want at the 40 camp in limsa or grid and i will put reveries or dunes against any of them in the amount of sp. in a sp = rank game the camp with better sp will be where people go.

Then if it's the "Best" why are you missing out on behest again?

Everyone follows the leader. >_> It has little to do with The absolute best.