Will Warriors ever get any LOVE?

[Crimson-Falcon]

im loving WAR so far lv36

if you got problem throwing off DPS

allocate your points on STR you DPS higher + parry a lot

sadly PLD while it look potent but i didnt like it for some reason but that doesnt mean i wont lv50 it maybe because im lv31 by it?

[Xariann]

im loving WAR so far lv36

if you got problem throwing off DPS

allocate your points on STR you DPS higher + parry a lot

sadly PLD while it look potent but i didnt like it for some reason but that doesnt mean i wont lv50 it maybe because im lv31 by it?

Original poster said Warrior is fine prior to ENDGAME. Level 36 is not endgame. I LOVE mine, I LOVE the style, it rocked for levelling. For ENDGAME when I do the maths and compare it to Paladin, I feel I need to apologise for bringing my warrior to things like HM Garuda and HM Titan. I will wait to get more gear before I do that, but I feel like I am doing a disservice to my party. I want to respec again though and try a more strength focus stat allocation (it's what I had before I hit 50, then I changed it), as I don't feel like a little extra HP helps at all. Plus most gear at end game for tanks doesn't have much strength, determination or crit on it.

[Sargon]

if you got problem throwing off DPS

WAR solo is fine and WAR in groups don't care about DPS per se. It's a more global issue with being hit harder and being harder to heal.

[BadRNG]

Why do people keep bringing up AK or mid level stuff? The very first sentence of the thread says endgame. That is when the disparity starts to become noticeable.

And it should be further noted that being able to clear endgame stuff (viability) is not the same as being as effective at doing it. Pretty much every endgame guild is saying PLDs are far safer/more reliable at that level.