from when the higher your aggro the more dps you do ?

[Balaur]

What is your question, exactly?

My head hurts reading this. It's not quite clear what you think you're saying, as the grammar needs cleaning up and the syntax is terrible.

[Zyeriis]

What is your question, exactly?

My head hurts reading this. It's not quite clear what you think you're saying, as the grammar needs cleaning up and the syntax is terrible.

I was fighting Ifrit (HM), as a dps, like usual. Everyone in the party was pretty good except the BLM. The healer used a tier 3 LB after Hellfire but the BLM had already died. I then asked the healer why they used it while the BLM was down. They apologized for making a mistake, and I forgave them.

The BLM then started complaining about me having the lost aggro level, accusing me of being a crappy DPS. I responded by asking if they were drunk (or something) for thinking that the aggro meters signify how much damage some one is doing. He replied "You're a burden on the team." I responded "Don't die and then say I'm the one who's a burden. My strongest attack does 250-400 damage and doesn't steal hate. Go level up Monk and then you can make these accusations. Don't get cocky just because you have Meteor."

There you go.

[Balaur]

There you go.

This doesn't answer my question, which is what is his question. The title of the thread seems to imply an interrogative, but your concision of his ... garble ... suggests gloating, as otherwise suggested in this thread. So I think my question still stands: "What is your question, exactly?" You certainly didn't answer.

If there is any question involved in this, it might be that the person is wondering if higher aggro means more damage being dealt, and/or/thus better damage over time. But the person seems to suggest the title is rheotrical, already thinking his dps is best even though he hits 400s in damage but despite which lost a level on Ifrit's enmity.

But the post, as a whole, is confusing, and potentially trolling. (In which case it is successful.)