Results -9 to 0 of 233

Threaded View

  1. #10
    Player
    Mychael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    917
    Character
    Justin Beiber
    World
    Ridill
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 1
    Quote Originally Posted by fusional View Post
    good thing we're not limited to single party content in ARR, right?!
    I never said you were limited. Are you suggesting that there is no more single-party content?

    Quote Originally Posted by fusional View Post
    lol, this guy
    If one out of six of DD jobs aren't exactly what you need, then your losses are <17% at max. If your healer is geared toward AoE heals (as someone suggested earler), or healing over time, but the mob is doing spike damage on one player, then there's really only one option. I don't see how that's funny. >.>;

    Quote Originally Posted by fusional View Post
    lyou mean like pld vs. war? so people would prefer one healer over the other situationally, depending on the content? which is how it already works with tanks and dps? and somehow this *isn't* okay for healers?
    I don't think it's okay for DD or tanks either, but this topic was on the creation of new healing jobs, rather than the balance of old jobs.

    Quote Originally Posted by fusional View Post
    lface. palm.



    because, once again- the only content we'll see in ARR is single party content, right?
    I addressed single-party content only--you already called me out on that yourself. With large-scale raids, it really doesn't matter how your healers work; if you have only low-potency healers, the quantity can make up for a lack of high-volume healers. If you have a lot of high-potency healing, they can spread out and kind of accomplish the same thing. Of course there could be an advantage to having different healers with different strengths, but I don't see it as essential for a raid as they're all serving the exact same purpose of regenerating HP.
    Quote Originally Posted by fusional View Post
    and god forbid we see single-party content requiring TWO HEALERS which might actually benefit from bringing along two different kinds of healers with different strengths?

    not trying to be rude, but... you don't have a lot of raiding/endgame experience, do you?
    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfie View Post
    So, it's okay to choose between DPS classes, but not okay to have a choice in tank and healer classes, is what you're getting at?




    What mental gymnastics got you there, and in this scenario why can't we just have one DPS class and that's it? Why does the game need variability in DPS classes, but not in tank and healers?
    With DPS, the different types are (at a basic level) ranged, magic, and melee. You could even consider sub-divisions such as piercing, slashing, blunt, etc, or combinations (if RDMs in XI were actually able to melee with En-spells in XI, Enhancement Shamans or Paladins (don't they get 10% light damage and some light magic?) in WoW). The mobs have several different defenses for each of those. Healing, at a base level, is always going to give someone their health back. En masse (i.e. a raid/endgame event), it doesn't really matter what denomination over what amount of time--100 every second will equal out to 500 every 5 seconds, etc, whereas different types of attacks will not necessarily balance out.

    I think it's a good idea to invent multiple kinds of healing, but I don't see a plausible way to differentiate between them where either 1) they're all not doing EXACTLY the same thing or 2) one becomes the only option.

    That said, there is already competition among DD classes, but I think that imbalance is something people typically complain about, not try to increase. Why should we create it among healing classes?

    If someone was suggesting a job that reduced HP loss by some other mechanic than directly "Player regains XXX hp," I'd be all for it--such as a class that specialized in damage prevention.

    EDIT: Zantetsuken suggested something like this above--this I could approve of.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zantetsuken View Post
    Bishop (2nd PGL job - inspired by FFTA) uses "Preventative Healing" - Healing spells recover a % target's current HP - can over-heal up to 120% of Max HP. (this style of healing is good for preparation for big battles, or to keep a tank healthy - it's potency drops greatly as the target loses HP)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dzian View Post
    I'm going to Disagree with your disagreement. there needs to be many more options for viable tank and healer jobs/classes. while a party may only need 1 tank. In my experience it is often that one key role that you lack. Its something XI. and to a slightly lesser degree 1.0 both suffered.

    In 1.0 there were days where i'd often see 4 or 5 shouts for the same thing by different groups but all of those groups needed the same thing often a tank. It became slightly less problematic with the pld buffs but still existed. in XI though there were times where you would sit in whitegate 5/6 in an exp party for sometimes a couple of hours just hoping to find a tank because there werent enough options.

    true with healers as well in 1.0 you'd do some primal dungeon whatever you're whm would drop to go to bed and you'd struggle to find another healer because it was the only option.
    I don't know that this was due to a lack of available options. I think a lot of people just don't WANT to tank or heal.
    (0)
    Last edited by Mychael; 02-08-2013 at 01:47 AM.