RPG Fan FFXIV Review has been updated (and is actually positive)

[Velhart]

Then you don't feel the game is crap, because thats an extreme way of saying you dislike it, lets put it into another context, do you say "I feel like crap" if you are fine? do you say food "is crap" when its the best food you have had?

Sometimes you like the game enough you are willing to deal with the server/UI issues.

[Jynx]

It's funny how a year ago people were calling these guys terrible because they gave the game a bad review (Allbeit with out of date data and other flaws)

But it's all good in the hood with a new positive upswing.

[Elexia]

I think that was a different site, not RPG Fan, the one that's always biased in reviews? MMO site was the one that reveiws FFXIV (and other MMOs) just before a patch or update to bring negative attention to it iirc?

[Leyza]

I think that was a different site, not RPG Fan, the one that's always biased in reviews? MMO site was the one that reveiws FFXIV (and other MMOs) just before a patch or update to bring negative attention to it iirc?

Yep, MMORPG.com if I'm remembering correctly.

[Molly_Millions]

It's funny how a year ago people were calling these guys terrible because they gave the game a bad review (Allbeit with out of date data and other flaws)

But it's all good in the hood with a new positive upswing.

That was mmorpg.com. That other article was written with completely outdated info and didn't even include new screenshots, all the ones they claimed were new, were screenshots from launch. Mmorpg.com basically republished a review from launch and called it a re-review.

[Fear]

It's funny how a year ago people were calling these guys terrible because they gave the game a bad review (Allbeit with out of date data and other flaws)

But it's all good in the hood with a new positive upswing.

I think its mostly due to the fact that its a thorough review who spent alot of time not a quick 30 min one.

[Leyza]

I think its mostly due to the fact that its a thorough review who spent alot of time not a quick 30 min one.

Or the fact it's a completely different site...

[Molly_Millions]

Or the fact it's a completely different site...

This is more like it. I confronted the mmorpg.com "journalists" on their forums and let them know how I felt about their lack of journalistic integrity back when that "re review" was published. Of course they banned me.

[Leyza]

This is more like it. I confronted the mmorpg.com "journalists" on their forums and let them know how I felt about their lack of journalistic integrity back when that "re review" was published. Of course they banned me.

I remember that. It's why I don't trust them. IGN all the way, for me!

[Delsus]

This is more like it. I confronted the mmorpg.com "journalists" on their forums and let them know how I felt about their lack of journalistic integrity back when that "re review" was published. Of course they banned me.

I got constant bans from mmorpg.com for disagreeing with the reviewer. They think they are right about everything to hell with what other people think, now if they post an up to date review and the reviewer actually plays the game rather than watching youtube vids, I will give them some credit.