This sounds like a whole lot of not my problem. Why does your class say Archer at level 100? Can we talk about that?So the defense is “it was all hypothetical” — convenient. Nothing like retroactively slapping a thought-experiment label on your own words once they get called out. Occam’s Razor here isn’t that you’re playing 4D chess; it’s that you said exactly what you meant, and now you’re backpedaling under the safety of hypotheticals.
And if pointing that out is “ad hominem,” then maybe the real problem isn’t my moral high ground — Calling out contradictions isn’t ad hominem — it’s just me putting a mirror up. If you don’t like the reflection, that’s not my fallacy.
“Wink wonk” is cute, but it doesn’t cover the fact that your stance has been moonwalking all over this thread. First, it was “let them die,” then “it’s hypothetical,” now it’s “actually, you’re just assuming.”
Nobody’s saying tanks never miss a grab — that happens to all of us. The problem was that you dressed it up, letting DPS faceplant, as some enlightened philosophy instead of just being late on a pull. That wasn’t an assumption; again, those were your own words.
If you’ve finally settled on “sometimes I miss stuff,” then hey — welcome to the same reality the rest of us were already living in. Congrats on catching up, champ.
Glad we cleared that up. Took a while, but we got there. That’s enough backflips for me. You can keep rewriting your stance; I’ll stick to playing the game.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.