Auto Demolition on EU and NA

[Batbrat]

Hello! Just here to agree, Housing Demolition NEEDS to be turned back on. ASAP!!
Again, this is lose / lose situation.
People waiting on a house can't get one = They unsub
People who have a house see no reason to log in = They unsub

This is not good, and demolition needs to be turned back on immediately. The only people against this are just a small loud defensive few who have houses that frankly, they don't even use, and don't need, since they're not even logging in anyway. I say this as someone with a Medium house that I go into daily. Repossess those abandoned houses, and let new people have them for a change! Tyty!

[BigCheez]

Hello! Just here to agree, Housing Demolition NEEDS to be turned back on. ASAP!!
Again, this is lose / lose situation.
People waiting on a house can't get one = They unsub
People who have a house see no reason to log in = They unsub

This is not good, and demolition needs to be turned back on immediately. The only people against this are just a small loud defensive few who have houses that frankly, they don't even use, and don't need, since they're not even logging in anyway. I say this as someone with a Medium house that I go into daily. Repossess those abandoned houses, and let new people have them for a change! Tyty!

I'd argue that trying to strongarm people into paying virtual rent while quality and quantity of content are both in the gutter is unfair. Housing demolition should remain off until things improve IMO.

[quidama]

In that case, if you're unwilling to pay virtual rent because you don't otherwise enjoy the content, then you shouldn't have a house. It's that simple.
Why should you be allowed to reserve a very limited housing spot in a video game which you don't even play anymore?

[BigCheez]

In that case, if you're unwilling to pay virtual rent because you don't otherwise enjoy the content, then you shouldn't have a house. It's that simple.
Why should you be allowed to reserve a very limited housing spot in a video game which you don't even play anymore?

Because I paid for it.

I want to play the game. Unfortunately, the game isn't worth playing at the minute. Make the game worth playing again and I'll happily return and continue paying virtual rent for my in-game house.

[MicahZerrshia]

In that case, if you're unwilling to pay virtual rent because you don't otherwise enjoy the content, then you shouldn't have a house. It's that simple.
Why should you be allowed to reserve a very limited housing spot in a video game which you don't even play anymore?

Why hold a multi-million dollar corperation responsible for it's product when you can blame the customers for the product they have payed for.

[PaulusHamsteru]

Why hold a multi-billion dollar corperation responsible for it's product when you can blame the customers for the product they have payed for.

FTFY. Their market cap is $8.4 billions.