Quote Originally Posted by adamisapsycho View Post
No such thing as objective opinion. Why can't you get to grip with somebody disagreeing with your analisys of this story? I don't think she was badly written, yes it's an opinion, but can you please, with a cherry on top, get over the idea that YOUR opinion is a fact, and others are wrong for liking something you don't? You know that "mixed" reviews mean some people like it and some don't, right? Tell me you are capable of at least understanding that.
You keep conflating two different things, people being mixed about liking something is not the same as something being objectively bad. Yes you can be objective in art critique, I've used this example in a similar argument. If you're judging a dancing contests, not liking the dance style they chose for this piece. Is somewhat subjective opinion. Saying they were late on the first turn is objective critique, the pirouette was poorly executed they didn't keep her knee at the right height their other leg was slightly bent, the parallels were off etc That's objective, it's a formal critique of the technical performance. That's what's being discussed. Now many people don't like is because the writing is bad, and some people like it despite the writing being bad, but it's inarguable that the writing standard in the MSQ is bad. With many many examples highlight the telling not showing, no character journey, heel turns with no build up or reasonable payoff etc etc.