
Originally Posted by
Tethan
snip
Yep, said it perfectly.

Originally Posted by
Tethan
He sacrificed his own chances of winning FOR HER and at the ascension ceremony this game has the GALL to act like... like he should so grateful for his dear, generous sister giving him this opportunity he clearly doesn't deserve. Watching that crowd dote on Wuk while hemming and hawing at the thought of him being co-leader... was gross. Gross, gross writing. And of course it was HER idea, this incredibly obvious solution of co-leading. Only Wuk Lamat, the kindest, most generous, peacefulest person ever, could come up with this idea.
This part angered me so much as well, especially in the context of what had conspired just before that. I just couldn't believe it.
(Spoiler 7th keystone challenge)
They clearly solved the problem together, each bringing their respective strength to the table. Without Wuk they wouldn't have been able to talk to the villagers and figure out the problem but it was Koana who actualls solved it with his science.
His contribution was in no way inferior and yet what he took from the events was that Wuk is "clearly superior and more fit to rule", even though without him she'd have failed just as hard as he would have without her.
The villagers wouldn't have put any trust in her words when they returned, if he hadn't come up with a solution to the soil problem.
So it was not only really disappointing that the villagers' praise wasn't given to both of them, but also that the narrative didn't question his giving up at all. Nobody of the cast encouraged him or told him his efforts were worth just as much.
We were just left with the message that his forfeiting was clearly the right choice.
I would have respected it if it was purely tactical to defeat the shade. As in: both are equally acknowledged but they know in order to beat the trial one of them has to give up so they can join forces. And then they could have decided that she has higher chances of winning because the WoL's on her side or something but they'd have agreed here and there (in a Meaningful Cutscene(TM)) they'll rule together as siblings.
It really bothered me how the narrative constantly dunked on the idea of advancement being inherently worse than "uniting the people with friendship" and keeping traditions.
Ironically in the Wild West themed world, when you visit the Miqo'te tribe, they have a short but much more nuanced and mature discussion of this topic than Wuk Lamat ever had during her whole arc.
Granted, after Koana has learned his lesson the benefits of his science are acknowledged and his speech about progress while preserving cultural heritage is good character growth.
But he was one side of the coin: good at one thing (science), blind to the other (people). Wuk was the opposite: blind to science, good at people. Both are needed for a good rule (which luckily is the story's conclusion at least).
But imo this means Wuk should also have had the same reality check that Koana needed, only in reverse.
Because in the end, her ideals couldn't protect the people against every threat. If all people stood together in harmony that wouldn't magically equip them with tools to defend themselves against all kinds of enemies, as the story literally shows later on. It's Koana's science that's used for defenses.
If the story had given both of them equal learning moments and led them together like that, their dynamic would have been much more enjoyable, while giving Wuk so much more depth.
But this insistence that "happy people" >>>>> "everything else, no matter how reasonable" bolstered by insipid platitudes really killed her characterisation.