

Right, but were we not told they weren’t tempered in the same way as we think beast tribes are (as in mind controlled)? I was always under the impression that the ascians had complete free will. At best a slight “tugging”.
Like wasn’t that part of the whole point behind them teaching the corrupted version of summoning to the beast tribes? Not that they did so to themselves.
A prime example would be Fandaniel; he was only kept in line by the more powerful Ascians…and as soon as they were out he went full murderhobo. I fail to see how a mind controlled tempered individual would be able to actively work towards the destruction of what is supposedly controlling it.
Or does this mean the effects of tempering don’t carry over once reincarnated? If so, then whether anyone was tempered or not is moot as it would only have applied to the unsundered.
Last edited by kaynide; 06-26-2024 at 12:01 AM.




I think that idea swings a little in each direction.
The "tug" was the quote from Livingway that Iscah was referring to. Livingway only underplays the effect in English, as if trying to acknowledge that the concern is hypothetically and technically valid while still being able to dismiss it entirely in the current situation. In some other languages, a "Zodiark-class primal would certainly pull you into its influence, but there's no concern of that in this case". Understating things just seems to be part of Livingway's characterization ("teeny-tiny toy boat").
The Ascians are indeed (usually) far from the examples we saw early in the game with the tribes, where the "well-cooked" tempered were nigh deranged in their zealotry if not outright mindless slaves. (Though even many of the "lightly baked" ones could pass as themselves until the moment they were activated or put in a situation where steadfast faith was relevant.)
Emet-Selch says they "now exist only to spread His Darkness", but the spectrum among the Ascians appeared to be more from "thinks Zodiark will solve all problems and is rigidly loyal to the Zodiark plan for salvation" to "will screw over other Ascians and endanger their machinations to sit at Zodiark's right hand". Certainly a more narrow spectrum. But it doesn't seem to be entirely free will.
Consider Emet-Selch: I don't think much of anything we saw from him was due to his tempering. But also he was one of the people who summoned Zodiark for the sake of the star's salvation. Fighting for the star, fighting for Amaurot, and loyalty to Zodiark went hand in hand. There was very little tension between Emet-Selch's free will and his tempering; very little opportunity for its effect to manifest as anything noteworthy or unexpected.
But - if I interpret him correctly - Emet-Selch in Shadowbringers seems to desperately desire to reevaluate the plan and the potential of the sundered, but he sets the bar for being convinced to do so to an unrealistic height. Personally, I like to interpret that as a subtle, insidious effect of his tempering, one of the only traces of it we ever see. Only after being defeated and fading away do Emet-Selch and Eldibus say, "Well, I don't regret fighting for my cause...but I see now how flawed our approach was." and in the latter's case this admission is within the same day or two of him being utterly convinced it was the only true path.
In my opinion - though there is considerable debate on this and people would jump to contradict me on this one, I'd bet - Nabriales, Igeyorhm, and especially Gaia in Eden seem to be setting up a mechanism for the sundered Ascians to revert to their tempered state when they revert to their previous identity despite having previously died and reborn as untempered people (because memory and soul are linked in FFXIV). Recall that Nabriales was willing to undermine Lahabrea himself to win Zodiark's favor from him. Every sundered Ascian still introduces themselves first and foremost as "Servant of Zodiark, the one true god."
I spent a lot of the lead-up to Endwalker saying, "I can't imagine Fandaniel isn't using Zenos to somehow serve Zodiark, because - given what we saw from the other sundered Ascians - I can't imagine how Fandaniel can both inherit the identity of Fandaniel and not be tempered until I see a counter-example or a new plot device."
And then Fandaniel revealed that he never saw himself as Fandaniel at all. He rejected that identity. He remained Amon.
That scene sounded (to me) to be written to subvert that very idea.
(Though my batting average ain't perfect, either.)
Last edited by Anonymoose; 06-26-2024 at 12:58 AM.




My own theory regarding the sundered Ascians is that they were tempered via the secret Ascian HQ being directly on top of a slumbering Elder Primal and a tonze of crystallized dark-aspected aether.
The unsundered didn’t have the benefit of having their souls scrubbed with intense aether post-mortem and were physically present at Zodiark’s summoning so it’s logical they’d have it more, but unlike Lahabrea’s purposefully flawed primals I was under the impression that for him and Emet-Selch it was more like a tug keeping them on track to bring Zodiark back instead of settling down and accepting their loss.
The sundered could very well have less aether corruption but they still have the purple tinged teleports (as opposed to the blue Ancient ones) so I feel like they have to at least have a bit of tempering. It could either give them a much looser leash or Amon/Fandaniel is just so nihilistic that it overrode what little tempering he had.
Bringing it back to DT and future content, I don’t know how that may affect a potential future sundered Convocation member who got away. Beastmen feel compelled to resummon defeated primals but those remaining Ascians would know it’s beyond their means. They may also be like Fandaniel with their own agendas but I don’t think SE would do that same plot twice.
There’s a bunch of black masks out there too but I’m convinced the writers have pretended to ignore their past existence in the narrative or plain forgot about them.




Even if the "reincarnation restores tempering" mechanic was real, all we need is new plot devices! Again! lol
Alisaie speculated that Bahamut "withdrew his claim" on Eula when she was struck down. Just say Elidibus or Fandaniel severed all existing connections somehow. Deliberately? Upon Elidibus's death when he himself realized how far things had gone astray? When Fandaniel crunched the "fathercrystal" in Zodiark's chest? If people want a Free Agent Ascian, SE probably has a few options. As much as I'd love to move on, the MATH AIN'T MATHIN' on how many Ascians are left, a lot of people will never settle for an incomplete accounting of the roster, and I find it hard to believe not a single writer is heading in the same direction as the "Free Agent" hopefuls.
Just give me something believable and human and painful or tragic. It could work. Cylva worked.
"I shall refrain from making any further wild claims until such time as I have evidence."
– Y'shtola




I can see them getting off-screened Gaius-style but with added certainty to their demise and done in a way to escalate the existing situation as a bonus.
“All of the remaining Ascians fled to one of their plan Bs after the loss of the unsundered three: Solution Nine. At which point the Enigmatic Maiden saw an opportunity with their leader gone and trapped them, consuming their aether in a part of her plan to save her people. Her airships that were once limited to Heritage Found due to reliance on lightning aether technology are now supplemented by dead Ascians and now she can project her military force across Tural.”
I’m sure many would be disappointed in such a situation but we have too many unaccounted for to have them all have a Fandaniel-esque spotlight in the MSQ and I’m sure the devs want to move on. I could see one or two showing up in side content though and I’m digging in like a tick on my Arcadion-Altima theory until I’m inevitably proven wrong.
Looking forward to the “Revelations from Dawntrail” thread and seeing how many more unanswered questions we have than resolutions.


Speaking of Elidabus, wasn’t he technically a primal?
My understanding is the original Elidabus was sacrificed, and the one we know of was created by the Ascians to be “Zodiark’s Heart”.
That being the case, wouldn’t he have been immune from any effects of tempering? (And perhaps that is why he occasionally worked in a way counter to the other Ascians)
And re: Fandaniel:
If he was able to remain Amon (and free of any mind control), yet retain all the powers of an Ascian, wouldn’t that make it even more feasible that an Ascian is just doing their own thing (and again making tempering moot in the first place in the potential case of Altima-Arcadion)?




Y'shtola surmises that - having sacrificed himself to become Zodiark's core, and then splintered off from that entity, Elidibus is necessarily driven by the intentions and desires that were part of his summoning, explaining why Elidibus can draw strength from others who desire salvation. Y'shtola - depending on the language - says he is a fragment of Zodiark's being, has Zodiark's will within him, and shares Zodiark's raison d'être. It's why I hesitate to call Elidibus "tempered" in the traditional sense. Rather than being brought into symbiosis with a primal, he just became a primal. I imagine that it's kinda hard to not to be in lockstep with yourself. But also I speculate that - being that the thing he became was a primal driven by a specific design, desire, and plan - he could no more go against "Zodiark's will" (i.e. the will Zodiark was summoned to have) than those who were tempered to it. There may be very little practical difference.Y'shtola
It stems from who─or rather what─you truly are: a primal.
<...>
Elidibus
Correct on all counts. Such is my nature, and such are my methods.
If another sundered Ascian was to admit they never truly accepted their identity, that's almost surely feasible. Mikko was just expressing doubt they'd use the same plot beat twice in a row.Fandaniel
I inherited the position─and the soul─of the Fandaniel who sat on the Convocation in the time of the Final Days. Theoretically speaking. Practically speaking, that fact is of no consequence! I was born and lived as...well. Me. Eventually I was recruited into the Ascians and imbued with the former Fandaniel's knowledge and memories, but I never felt that they were truly a part of who I am.
Last edited by Anonymoose; 06-26-2024 at 05:25 PM.
"I shall refrain from making any further wild claims until such time as I have evidence."
– Y'shtola



I think the thing to always keep in mind regarding future Ascian plots is that, frankly, I don't even think the writers are that enamored with them. The Ancients, sure, they seemed to absolutely love writing the pretty giants who apparently had no problems until suddenly having every single problem all at once, but I've never sensed that enthusiasm about writing the Ascians. They killed three of them off-screen in the back half of Stormblood's patches, and haven't mentioned a single one of those again; that's not the behavior of a writing team that loves writing that particular group.
That increases the chance of a curveball to somewhere around 100%. If we get another one in Dawntrail, I don't even think it'll be recognizable on its face unless you were REALLY looking for it specifically. And even then, it might be pretty reductive to be looking for it as 'an Ascian story'.
Last edited by Cleretic; 06-26-2024 at 12:06 PM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|