Results 1 to 10 of 60

Thread: RNG Fairness

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Seera1024's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Posts
    406
    Character
    Chymea Sum
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Vryn View Post
    The fairest solution would be to allow the transfers and the people who got the house with the current system with one submission. To those houses that had more than 1 + submission, they should be made to do it again, but I see no reason why FCS or private housing that had one submission should be forced to do it again when they should have won the property. All you would be doing is punishing those who should have rightfully won and compound their chances of failure even further as time progresses because it would be impossible to determine who won the plot on other slots.
    The problem with that is what if the one who won it this time was a relocating house that accepted the winning bid and their house transferred.

    Is the system set up to know which plot a house transferred from?

    If it's not, then you'd have a huge disaster if that FC or individual then lost the new auction. They went from having a house to not having a house. And I think that would be a worse situation to be in.

    Fairest way to handle it without having to deal with any possible additional technical glitches is to just run the ones who errored out and gave 0 or "no participants" as the result.
    (6)

  2. #2
    Player Vryn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    218
    Character
    Vryn Thorn
    World
    Lich
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Seera1024 View Post
    The problem with that is what if the one who won it this time was a relocating house that accepted the winning bid and their house transferred.

    Is the system set up to know which plot a house transferred from?

    If it's not, then you'd have a huge disaster if that FC or individual then lost the new auction. They went from having a house to not having a house. And I think that would be a worse situation to be in.

    Fairest way to handle it without having to deal with any possible additional technical glitches is to just run the ones who errored out and gave 0 or "no participants" as the result.
    I agree with this, point well stated.
    (1)