Can we get polygamous eternal bonds?

[LisSquid]

All I can think of is the intricate web of teleportation networks this would create.

[lezard21]

All I can think of is the intricate web of teleportation networks this would create.

Didn't think about this, but indeed. Brb establishing a waifu network to teleport all the way up the Kugane tower.

[Shin96]

All I can think of is the intricate web of teleportation networks this would create.

At least bots wouldnt seem so out of place anymore

[Alaray]

They do. No one is saying polyamorous people are weird.

I'm saying requesting such a feature at a time when actual content is getting pushed back is a weird request.

It's about priorities, not about biases.

People can request features at any time, spark discussion of the possibility, and if it were to gain enough traction potentially have something worked on when possible. It's not like it'd be a priority even if the development team thought it was a good idea, it'd definitely be on a backburner.

[Katie_Kitty]

They do. No one is saying polyamorous people are weird.

I'm saying requesting such a feature at a time when actual content is getting pushed back is a weird request.

It's about priorities, not about biases.

Pretty normal for people to post about stuff they want. What's not normal is all of the people who immediately came in here acting like it was the most ridiculous suggestion ever, or like the OP was a troll for posting it. That definitely speaks to a bias.

[Lunalepsy]

All I can think of is the intricate web of teleportation networks this would create.

Sounds like a good script for a fanfic!

[Avidria]

All I can think of is the intricate web of teleportation networks this would create.

This was my first thought too lmao
I mean I think it'd be awesome, specifically because it'd mean more free teleports, but given they're adjusting teleports to be a bit more of a (at first glance seemingly inconsequential??) gil sink I doubt they'd do it. The free wedding gives the teleporty ring too after all

[lezard21]

Pretty normal for people to post about stuff they want. What's not normal is all of the people who immediately came in here acting like it was the most ridiculous suggestion ever, or like the OP was a troll for posting it. That definitely speaks to a bias.

And just as it's normal for people to post about stuff they want, it's also pretty normal for people to post why they think it's a bad idea or why they think devs should focus on something else first.

The only bias I see is you choosing to see people that disagree with OP's suggestion as some sort of "polyamorphobic" people.

[Katie_Kitty]

And just as it's normal for people to post about stuff they want, it's also pretty normal for people to post why they think it's a bad idea or why they think devs should focus on something else first.

The only bias I see is you choosing to see people that disagree with OP's suggestion as some sort of "polyamorphobic" people.

I mean, we literally have one guy in this thread trying to push the "One man and one woman" narrative. It's hilariously naive to suggest there isn't some very open bias here in these comments.

[Bacent]

Eternal bond is based upon the heterosexual one on one bond and one has to carry the damn flowers even if both are makes.

It's pretend -its not really worth anything beyond the mounts

The two genders. Makes and femakes