Why are the savage clear rates in the JP Datacenter so much higher than NA?

[MPK]

Wrong and dumb take.
The problem is the pool of raiders is smaller on Crystal. The bads on crystal are just as bad as the bads on primal, except anecdotally the bads on crystal will not go 0-100 when an error is called out on them.
Source: I've pugged primal and crystal and frankly I prefer the pugs on crystal... whenever there are any, that is.

Never said that raider on crystal are bad. It's just pretty clear that crystal cares more about other "content".

Guess which one of this is Crystal and which one is Gaia


Hint: Obviously there's a very strong correlation between the amount of Lalafells and total savage clears

[WhyAmIHere]

Never said that raider on crystal are bad. It's just pretty clear that crystal cares more about other "content".

Guess which one of this is Crystal and which one is Gaia


Obviously there's a very strong correlation between the amount of Lalafells and total savage clears

Regarding the bold: no that's literally exactly what you implied.
Verbatim copy-paste, "Aether good ^_^
Primal good ^_^
Crystal -------- Kek"

Sure you didn't bluntly and directly say they were bad, you just asserted the other two were good, and Crystal wasn't. Let everyone else make their own assumption, am I right? :^)

EDIT::
Also, strawmanning implications where you bring up lalafells? While you yourself play as one? You must be a hit at drive-in theaters, with how great a projector you are. :^)

[Enla]

-snip-

Not that I agree with MPK's attempt to troll but the Lalafell graph is Gaia. JP Datacenters tend to have more Lalafell players than the NA ones do according to LuckyBancho.