The issue at hand is we have nothing but speculation, ONCE AGAIN, with no clear definition of WHY the ToS were violated. People deserve clear reasons. You cannot be rightfully held accountable on something you don't know you did.
The issue at hand is we have nothing but speculation, ONCE AGAIN, with no clear definition of WHY the ToS were violated. People deserve clear reasons. You cannot be rightfully held accountable on something you don't know you did.





It was plain as day regarding the first "case". The 2nd I'm guessing the OP intentionally left ambiguous just to try and further their point. The only thing I can agree with is that the GMs need to be more open about why they are punishing someone. I have never disputed that at all, regardless of the circumstances.
Considering it was 18+, and in the PF, I doubt it was the 2nd thing. You must be new here. Hi, and welcome. People have been using alternate words/definitions to circumvent the system.I feel like if you're going to quote a dictionary meaning, you should probably quote the whole thing instead of picking and choosing what part suits your narrative, dove.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
dal·li·ance
/ˈdalēəns/
Learn to pronounce
noun
a casual romantic or sexual relationship.
"Jack was not averse to an occasional dalliance with a pretty girl"
brief or casual involvement with something.
"Berkeley was my last dalliance with the education system"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



