Roleplay/Partyfinder Discrepancies & Policy Enforcement by GM's

[RickmanUK]

I was meaning that all the Social Aspects of the Game that are on PF should be treated the same and reported/moved to a seperate thing so everyone is on the same page. That way the PF can remain for the pure "Do content as soon as group is ready", and adverts for FCs, Statics Selling, Crafting etc are under a seperate thing... Since then they can act on a definitive ruleset for PF and SF (Social Finder) and this type of thing shouldn't come up again.... It probably will depending on WHY it happened (Could be some bad faith actors against RP, could be a GM acting upon their own preferences etc).

[Nakarumi]

I was meaning that all the Social Aspects of the Game that are on PF should be treated the same and reported/moved to a seperate thing so everyone is on the same page. That way the PF can remain for the pure "Do content as soon as group is ready", and adverts for FCs, Statics Selling, Crafting etc are under a seperate thing... Since then they can act on a definitive ruleset for PF and SF (Social Finder) and this type of thing shouldn't come up again.... It probably will depending on WHY it happened (Could be some bad faith actors against RP, could be a GM acting upon their own preferences etc).

Right, the source of the incident is still unknown, and for people playing the blame game... it's not going to achieve anything. However, we DO need clarification from SE and a fair and amenable resolution does need to be found as it has apparently *points to the previous 8 pages* caused some kind of discourse and rift in the game community as a whole.

[Larkspen]

Content and other PFs are already at the top while RP and "other" listings are at the bottom. All people have to do is stop scrolling.