Quote Originally Posted by Elladie View Post
But it is nonsense to argue that G'raha is a good guy, he does exactly the same thing as Emet Selch; he destroys entire world/s to save the people in the past who are already dead and gone.
Quote Originally Posted by Shougun View Post
If you go back in time some people will not be born anymore and new actions will alter their timelines entirely (some for the worse some for the better, depending on what it could obviously be "a lot more for the better"). For you personally perhaps you've lost nothing or actually gained ("eeeh I got my grandpa back!"), but some will have lost something even if they don't remember it (or not existed, and due to new changes in the timeline may never exist again- so a full stop end to their story). So by going back some will have gone and stayed gone (and some will have been brought back/be born that would not have been born otherwise). Not selling it as a pure negative but to me traveling back within a singular timeline (vs cross infinite dimensions) is at least like using a mass destruction bomb to end a war, the war may have cost a trillion times the bomb and so "worth it" but the bomb still cost something too. Might understand why you used the bomb but not sure I'd want to dance around and high five for it.
My point being I wouldn't equate G'raha's actions with Emet's on the morality scale. If I'm alive in both timelines, I've not really been "destroyed" because I don't consider the world having been destroyed just because it's been altered. G'raha is not only trying to save dead people, he could be trying to save the living people in this timeline as well. For all we know, the Eighth Calamity was an extinction level event, one that would last centuries.