Job soulstones

[Rasikko]

...When the lvl45 GLD tanks better than the last tank that was a PLD..

[CazzT]

Job icons are still a thing

What do icons have to do with anything?

[Crushnight]

I doubt the coding would allow for it. Biggest hurdle would be the SMN/SCH split.

I don't know about how hard the coding would be but arcanist would have the summoner job stone as recommended as they are both dps, arcanist cannot wear any of scholar's gear, when you go to equip a sch only weapon it'll force the job stone on removing all gear that sch can't equip. Sch is hardwired from 50 to not interact with Smn and arcanist in any way including gear.

[TheMightyMollusk]

I'm not sure this is even necessary anyway. I can't honestly recall the last time I saw someone without the soulstone that was over level 30. And chances are, if someone is running without their soulstone, they have a reason for it (most likely trolling).

I had a party in Orbonne when it was current that had a gladiator, a conjurer, two archers, and a lancer. There's no justification for it beyond trolling.

[Seraphor]

I had a party in Orbonne when it was current that had a gladiator, a conjurer, two archers, and a lancer. There's no justification for it beyond trolling.

Did a Copied Factory run with all base classes, it was pretty neat. But queueing without a full 24 man premade is definitely poor form.

[SinisterJoints]

Why not just get rid of them entirely. They offer nothing. Just let weapons determine the job (like crafters and gatherers) and just get rid of the whole level subclass/pick subclass (its just not needed now and adds nothing for the new player other than a mild annoyance)

[Nedkel]

Dont fix something that is not broken, thanks.

[Paladinleeds]

Instead, what I would rather do is them change the duties from say The Sunken Temple of Q'arn (level 35, we could even do Brayflox's Longstop at leevl 32), put a limit in place that stops the classes being able to join, much like how BLU is limited.

[CazzT]

I had a party in Orbonne when it was current that had a gladiator, a conjurer, two archers, and a lancer. There's no justification for it beyond trolling.

Where was I justifying it? Pointing out a scenario is not justifying it. Why do people twist things so much on these forums?

[TheMightyMollusk]

Where was I justifying it? Pointing out a scenario is not justifying it. Why do people twist things so much on these forums?

Um.

And chances are, if someone is running without their soulstone, they have a reason for it (most likely trolling).

I was agreeing with you.