It's time (Option to Hide other players Glamour)

[Gula]

To be fair you can only get banned if the person does something to bring attention to themselves, otherwise SE really does not care. Which is why personally this whole thing confuses me outside of extremely rare situtions people would not have any idea someone has the feature on or off, so wouldn't it be like modding just more available.

Here ya go, putting words into SE's mouth. Did you miss the Live Letter in which Yoshi P addressed mods? And how they changed how markers worked because of mods??

[Joven]

The number of likes hardly matters since it can't be quantified or opposed directly with dislikes.

While I do agree that we need both metrics the fact that there are 100+ likes shows that there are people who find merit in this idea. Even it there were a substantial dislike ratio it wouldn't alter the fact that there is an interest.

[Gula]

While I do agree that we need both metrics the fact that there are 100+ likes shows that there are people who find merit in this idea. Even it there were a substantial dislike ratio it wouldn't alter the fact that there is an interest.

Not if there's 300+ dislikes next to it.

[VictorTheed]

I agree with you OP, especially since the days of the male bunny outfit I have wanted something like a glam hide option.

[Awha]

Here ya go, putting words into SE's mouth. Did you miss the Live Letter in which Yoshi P addressed mods? And how they changed how markers worked because of mods??

Been away, is that how they tread to break that plugin, that honestly does not change anything since the person that uses the plugin would still be able to use it, just would not be able to mark it for the rest of the group.

I still stand by SE does not care, because they straight up just threw every legitment use of using markers while in combat under the bus due to a knee jerk reaction. Do not want to derail the the thread and turn it into mods, plugin debate though.

As it stands they can plea with the community all the want to not use certain things, but without constant action and enforcment of their ToS, I do feel it safe to assume on a whole they do not care about the grey area all that much unless attention is brought to it, and SE feels it negatively impacts the game. In the case of this hypothcial feature I do not see how it would negatively impact the game, because I do not think the community at large would shift to the assumption that most people use said feature so what my character looks like does not matter anymore.

[Jadedsins]

I'm just glad that the posters against the idea do an excellent job at keeping the thread at the top of the page and ensure that more people see it and leave a like on the original post.

On that note, as of the time of this post there's 101 likes!

We got to make sure everyone knows why they are wrong for wanting this.

[Kobalos]

I agree with you OP, especially since the days of the male bunny outfit I have wanted something like a glam hide option.

All the folks complaining about dudes in dresses, thongs and bunny outfits tend not to have a problem with all the bikini clad bunny, cat and lizard girls...Just sayin'

[Joven]

We got to make sure everyone knows why they are wrong for wanting this.

How is it "wrong" to want an optional feature that doesn't harm anyone? If wanting something like this is wrong then why not go to the male Viera thread and tell them all that they are wrong for wanting something that not everyone wants. Since when are you the moral arbiter of what's wrong or right?

All the folks complaining about dudes in dresses, thongs and bunny outfits tend not to have a problem with all the bikini clad bunny, cat and lizard girls...Just sayin'

Except for the part where OP specifically said:

So now that we have female characters tanking in string bikini's...

Everyone only keeps bringing up the way guys can dress and ignore the rest because it make them appear to have a moral edge against implied "bigots".

[Arngrim_Greyashe]

While I do agree that we need both metrics the fact that there are 100+ likes shows that there are people who find merit in this idea. Even it there were a substantial dislike ratio it wouldn't alter the fact that there is an interest.

100 likes its a measly amount in the grand scheme of things. I think I saw someone throw out a number, 1.1 million active subs? Something like that. Not all of those people come on here so there's part of a missing demographic. And without a dislike option, there's another missing demographic. I'd be curious to see where this thread would fall if both were added into a grand total.

[SturmChurro]

While I do agree that we need both metrics the fact that there are 100+ likes shows that there are people who find merit in this idea. Even it there were a substantial dislike ratio it wouldn't alter the fact that there is an interest.

There's an interest in a lot of dumb things. Doesn't mean they should ever be added, or God forbid even bother wasting the devs time reading this mess.