There has been a re-occurring theme in Old media, you know books, movies, TV Shows, etc. There theme is there isn't really a bad guy. In your story; I bet you paint yourself as the good guy. Even though you may in fact be the bad guy overall, hypothetically speaking.
That's basically a misunderstanding of aether, and the player brought back the darkness of the night sky as per the legends on the first. Ascians are basically permanently attuned/skewed to darkness like the voidsent, but the aether as it normally channeled is non-aspected, and the light on the first is umbral aspected/passive/still/static. It's just not the aesthetic of darkness that you were expecting. Also, we don't have to make pacts with Ifrit to cast fire spells or flare, or Shiva to cast Blizzard or freeze, and summons are like constructs. They're imaginations just ran astrally out of control
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ewwwwwww, it's all glowwy again!


would rather have them called ffxiv Nightbringer
I like name Shadowbringer I wonder if mean more one bring back night to the world of first. SE sure prove my theory correct that warrior of light is the first world of warrior of darkness as in one who return the night sky to people of the first. through I confuse by next mainline quest promise of valor act of cruelity I confuse who act of cruelity are we talk about ascian I hope we don't see death of scions we lost enough scion please SE
darkness can also mean night


Would have been deceptive marketing it the WoL had the spotlight stolen
by Ardbert at the end. Since the entire buildup was finally about us the players actually taking charge.


It Kind of is but the opening is super cool so whatever.
Your kind of actually playing the warrior of too much light more than anything
since we didn't use any darkness to win our battles including the last boss should have called it Nightbringers or Lightbringers just my 2cents.


Now that I think about it... the title 'Shadowbringers' is probably a red herring.


All the shadow/darkness stuff relates to The First's idea of darkness, not our own. Anyone who feels decieved hasn't been paying attention.
Besides, 'deceptive marketing' is a redundant title. It's just marketing.


"Lightquellers" was discarded because it didn't have the same impact I guess
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote



