Quote Originally Posted by JunseiKei View Post
I did not imply I'm "saving us all." I'm helping to push instances along. Nothing more, nothing less.

The issue at hand is not something that is regularly dealt with. We see it at expansions and this is occurring because of new updates to Eureka and Arsenal and the Valentine's event. Most of the time, there's no real need to invest in something like having more server space to allow more instances. The cost argument is not irrelevant simply because you declared it; it's a business and costs and profit are the [main] concern. You're right, they aren't a "crappy indie company" - such business may make that mistake of adding in instances they cannot support in the long run after player activity has dropped off. It's not called entitlement, it's called business. Perhaps you should look into things that attribute to MMOs' failures, because what you are suggesting has been a contributing factor in other games and companies in this genre that have ultimately come and gone.

You're also willfully forgetting they have plans to add in a new datacenter and move servers. Why add temporary servers now when even that is in the works? That's rhetorical, by the way.
Yea because i could see FFXIV failing because SE added some more temporary servers to house the increased player count when releasing new content. If you say so. Add new servers and data centers down the line? But not when releasing new content that is going to bring the dwindling player base back? C'mon. Don't be an overzealous fanboy. Be realistic. Adding temp servers wouldn't have hurt them even a little. Besides, its all irrelevant because like i said, the biggest issue is the lack of response. Feel free to continue beating a dead horse and defending a company that's taking your money for content you can't even play though.

Again.. would be nice to get some sort of response, devs...