Results 1 to 10 of 31

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player Theodric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    10,051
    Character
    Matthieu Desrosiers
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Reaper Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Caitlinzulu View Post
    yuck, just eww. i always flatly refused to wear them and avert my eyes if some nearby has some on. shudder
    Out of curiosity, do you do the same thing when you see a scantily clad female character in a bikini?
    (13)

  2. #2
    Player
    Caitlinzulu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    889
    Character
    Caitlin Seraphim
    World
    Shiva
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Theodric View Post
    Out of curiosity, do you do the same thing when you see a scantily clad female character in a bikini?
    Nope, though i find it stupid in dungeon, the infamous armoured bikini. Swimwear is for social occasions. Using it in dungeons is too close to treating characters as sex objects.
    Its the male underwear look of subligars that i find offensive.
    (1)

  3. #3
    Player
    Rosentretter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    The Crystarium
    Posts
    346
    Character
    Theodore Rosentretter
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Caitlinzulu View Post
    Nope, though i find it stupid in dungeon, the infamous armoured bikini. Swimwear is for social occasions. Using it in dungeons is too close to treating characters as sex objects.
    Its the male underwear look of subligars that i find offensive.
    +1 to this
    (0)

  4. #4
    Player
    kikix12's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    953
    Character
    Seraphitia Faro
    World
    Midgardsormr
    Main Class
    Scholar Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Rosentretter View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Caitlinzulu View Post
    Swimwear is for social occasions. Using it in dungeons is too close to treating characters as sex objects.
    Its the male underwear look of subligars that i find offensive.
    +1 to this
    There's a lot of ridiculous clothing. There's a lot of unreasonable clothing. Am I supposed to be offended about a 'maid' or 'butler' in a dungeon?! Or maybe someone with a hat that symbolizes a gob? Hey, maybe I should be offended for those clothes made from animals skin...

    It's a game. Its age rating is 14+ in USA I reckon. It would be around that in other regions. If you are offended by something that should not be offensive to a reasonable 14-15 year old, then I think there are bigger issues than there being subligars in this game.

    Mind you, I talk about the "offended" part. By all means, go ahead and dislike it, even hate it. Go and drop parties or remove from your parties people with clothes like that. It's fair game. But being offended by them is immature.
    (9)

  5. #5
    Player
    Ashgarth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    558
    Character
    Ashgarth Sorel
    World
    Louisoix
    Main Class
    Red Mage Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Caitlinzulu View Post
    Nope, though i find it stupid in dungeon, the infamous armoured bikini. Swimwear is for social occasions. Using it in dungeons is too close to treating characters as sex objects.
    Its the male underwear look of subligars that i find offensive.
    You can always try to mod the game so that everyone is a cat-girl so you don't have to be offended by anyone else having fun with their character's clothes
    (8)

  6. #6
    Player
    basketofseals's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    815
    Character
    Verrine Mercer
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Samurai Lv 86
    Quote Originally Posted by Caitlinzulu View Post
    Nope, though i find it stupid in dungeon, the infamous armoured bikini. Swimwear is for social occasions. Using it in dungeons is too close to treating characters as sex objects.
    Its the male underwear look of subligars that i find offensive.
    I'm sensing some double standards here.
    (6)