No. I LET it happen to my house, to let my money do the talking. I won't financially support their terrible design decisions. This whole post is me simply finally being able to tell them why I stopped giving them my money. Apartments might be enough to get me back, but that doesn't change the fact that I'm out millions of gil and worse, the house I meticulously created and loved. You can blame that on me all you want but it was SE's decision to put terrible limits on housing and SE's decision to punish players for taking breaks and SE who deleted my stuff.
Maybe, maybe not. The least I could do is tell them why I stopped giving them my business. Whether or not it changes the way they feel about how they've designed housing I'm sure it's something they desire to know.
And there you are again, missing the point of my post. People keep saying "well on the other end someone gets to have a house now, someone benefited from your leaving." It's terrible design to have someone who can't take a break or risk losing countless hours of their work, at the expense of someone else not having access to content they would like to acquire. That's where people miss the point of my post - they fail to see what the system could have been, and that no one should have had to have such severe negative consequences inflicted on them. They are only looking at my post within the walls that SE placed around housing, that don't have to be there (and should never have been there).
Umm no, housing is NOT a "tiny part of the game". My house was one of the main things that I enjoyed most about the game. A solid percentage of my time was spent farming gil to buy, build, and furnish that house.
The fact that I had to lose my house so a FC could get one is a huge clue as to how bad the system is.
How can you walk in your house if you're taking a break (ie not subbed)?



Reply With Quote

