My absence and return - thoughts on demolished houses

[Inferiae]

Alright, so your join date is Feb 2014. You stopped playing about two years ago (2015), so you've effectively played for just over a year. Assuming your house was never empty after it was demolished, another player(s) has played from 2015 until today, 2017. They've paid the equivalent of two years worth of subscription, while you've paid only one.

If anything, they should have the house more than you.

[Rankina]

Alright, so your join date is Feb 2014. You stopped playing about two years ago (2015), so you've effectively played for just over a year. Assuming your house was never empty after it was demolished, another player(s) has played from 2015 until today, 2017. They've paid the equivalent of two years worth of subscription, while you've paid only one.

If anything, they should have the house more than you.

With that logic, assuming OP was serious about taking a month break, he'd have been paying for close to 3 years if Square Enix didn't punish the players for their awful system. Therefore, he'd deserve the house more.