A detailed Reaction to Warrior in SB

[Tegernako]

Perhaps. The main problem I see is that Defiance still has the damage penalty so I'm not sure if it would be enough to make up for it.

It would bring up IB/SP to original healing levels and also give healing to all its moves like BB. It would be small but considering how everything we do is dictated by dealing damage it would help a tiny bit with WAR's sustain and certainly would fit with the theme of the class.

That being said, they should just frigging give back BB to us and remove shake it off.

[YitharV2]

It would bring up IB/SP to original healing levels and also give healing to all its moves like BB. It would be small but considering how everything we do is dictated by dealing damage it would help a tiny bit with WAR's sustain and certainly would fit with the theme of the class.

That being said, they should just frigging give back BB to us and remove shake it off.

What I found out about IB/SP is that it's not supposed to be a specific number. It's just logarithmic decay.



Yeah, I totally agree. But sadly I feel that won't happen.

[Tegernako]

Yep, that's why they changed the description to "heals for 50% and heals for 100%" to "heals for a percentage".

And no it won't happen.

[HappyHubris]

Currently, my WAR just feels dull. Yes I can hold threat, reduce incoming damage with cooldown, and taunt, but instances just feel like a soulless 123124 spam. I want to love my warrior for his aesthetics, but it just is too monotonous right now.

[Umbeliel]

I'm not going to make a deal of it since we were basically given no information either way, but nothing said in the letter actually leads me to believe that they don't actually know what the problems we're having are at all lol. Stance dancing shouldn've had a cost to begin with, but it doesn't like... fix the rest of the total lack of utility or identity. It's a bit hard to be thankful of someone fixing a mistake they made in the first place, y'know?

[Tondier]

I'm not going to make a deal of it since we were basically given no information either way, but nothing said in the letter actually leads me to believe that they don't actually know what the problems we're having are at all lol. Stance dancing shouldn've had a cost to begin with, but it doesn't like... fix the rest of the total lack of utility or identity. It's a bit hard to be thankful of someone fixing a mistake they made in the first place, y'know?

I'd love for them to do a complete overhaul of the job, and make it more in line with their vision for the other classes, but in all honesty that's not going to happen until at least 5.0. I think the beast gauge change being reverted is enough for me to not quit WAR as I had potentially planned on doing, but I just really hope they make shake it off something legitimately interesting.

[Emitans]

I'm not going to make a deal of it since we were basically given no information either way, but nothing said in the letter actually leads me to believe that they don't actually know what the problems we're having are at all lol. Stance dancing shouldn've had a cost to begin with, but it doesn't like... fix the rest of the total lack of utility or identity. It's a bit hard to be thankful of someone fixing a mistake they made in the first place, y'know?

It's a live letter mainly talking about 4.05. They're not going to be able to rehaul the job in just a few days.

[Tegernako]

They done good today. I'm glad I was wrong.

[Baci]

Have to wait for the Patchnotes for more details. But so far I´m ok with the changes. Also depends on how much STR they add to the Fending.

[Poison_Rose]

Have to wait for the Patchnotes for more details. But so far I´m ok with the changes. Also depends on how much STR they add to the Fending.

There's a lot that hinges on this. They said "a small amount" which I'm hoping is in the 50-60 range (or higher?? ), not 10.