Resolving the Balmung Population Issue at Minimal Cost to the Benefit of All Players

[Galgarion]

So... seeing things more logically rather than from an emotionally selfish perspective makes you a doormat? Hmm. That's rather interesting.

Okay, now you're just throwing words at the screen. "Seeing things more logically rather than from an emotionally selfish perspective." What in the name of Aelius Donatus, is "an emotionally selfish perspective?" You're going to be embarrassed by that sentence one day when you're older.

[Valkyrie_Lenneth]

Okay, now you're just throwing words at the screen. "Seeing things more logically rather than from an emotionally selfish perspective." What in the name of Aelius Donatus, is "an emotionally selfish perspective?" You're going to be embarrassed by that sentence one day when you're older.

Ya know, you arent really acting any better lol.

[Galgarion]

Ya know, you arent really acting any better lol.

I concede your point. But I did transfer, so you can't call it classic Balmung.

[Valkyrie_Lenneth]

I concede your point. But I did transfer, so you can't call it classic Balmung.

Until it changes on your forum profile, you are classic balmung

[Galgarion]

Until it changes on your forum profile, you are classic balmung

Well, damn.

[Elamys]

Exactly. Not only free transfers, but also chocobo feathers and millions of free gil.

I don't care about the gil. I can make millions easy already. I don't care about the chocobo feathers. I have 4 people I recruited.

I care about my FRIENDS that I play with.

Also, can we stop spreading around the flat out LIE that Balmung was closed to character creation? Balmung - every server - was closed to character creation when there was a queue. SE never officially said "okay, you can never ever create characters on Balmung." There were still windows of time when character creation was open. That's how we still had bots, and frequently.

[NorthernLadMSP]

I don't care about the gil. I can make millions easy already. I don't care about the chocobo feathers. I have 4 people I recruited.

I care about my FRIENDS that I play with.

And your FRIENDS can also transfer - for FREE.

At this point, I simply look at these responses as excuses.

[Elamys]

My friends are in my free company. We have a house, 3 airships, and a lot of people. Mateus, a world that a lot of people pointed out as "having a lot of houses," has had its plots taken up. How many people have to transfer for it to be okay? Why do we have to give up on things we worked hard on? The problem was exacerbated by people refusing to log out, how terrible that you have to log out of the game when you're not there.

[ErikMynhier]

It's a poor as fuck, I agree. It however seems to be the only thing that can get it through some peoples' minds that it is not simple. MOVING is never simple. But you still have plenty of people who say that the option is simple, they should have left months after the world found out about it because it is still happening. Nothing there was solved. Flint still has issues with its water supply and rich, privileged people will say it's as simple as "you just transfer". People say the same thing about other similarly-threatening issues. Poor school environments. Bad rental situations.

The point is that "you can move" is NOT simple and that it is not an easy task.

You over stepped, we all do it from time to time. Defending it makes it worse. Drop it.

[ExKage]

You over stepped, we all do it from time to time. Defending it makes it worse. Drop it.

Who's the one bringing it up 3 hours later?