But if it were 2 7A, then we'd be at 26 years since Doma fell, and 21 years since the fall of Ala Mhigo. That's what's bugging Moose, and now me.
Perhaps that's the real reason the Encyclopaedia Eorzea timeline cuts off at 1572...
But if it were 2 7A, then we'd be at 26 years since Doma fell, and 21 years since the fall of Ala Mhigo. That's what's bugging Moose, and now me.
Perhaps that's the real reason the Encyclopaedia Eorzea timeline cuts off at 1572...
あっきれた。




Thank you, lol.
Important Note #1 Yes, it is the inconsistency that gives me pause. This is the only example of a concrete year of time movement (usually it's vague to preserve some semblance of normalcy) and it appears alongside other dates that did not move with it.
Important Note #2 Yes, it's entirely conceivable that more than a year of time has passed in the main scenario, but that's not the same thing as the open world experiencing a movement of time. Based on what we know, no matter what happens, even if you were to cram 5,000 days into the main scenario, the world shouldn't age into 2 Seventh Astral Era. It's a Simpsons-like "time-stoppage" to keep the text in order. If that changes, we need to know as soon as possible so we can start <winces at the thought> being ready to calculate what year things happened based on where the NPC is and when they were last updated when they say how long ago it was.
Last edited by Anonymoose; 06-24-2017 at 07:15 AM.
"I shall refrain from making any further wild claims until such time as I have evidence."
– Y'shtola
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote


