Nope. People hate Parry because it has a really crappy scaling rate, because the combat table sets almost everything against it, and because it doesn't provide a meaningful impact on group success (there isn't enough incoming damage outside of tankbusters for it to feel worthwhile, and tankbusters are almost always predictable). Upgrading to a piece of gear with more Def/MDef is going to see infinitely better mitigation returns than even moving from a full-Crit piece to a full-Parry piece, and when you compare that feeble amount of mitigation to the potential of killing a boss 1% faster, it isn't worth it.
I'd really like for Parry to become a more worthwhile stat, but SE would need to make a lot of changes for that to be the case. For a rundown on it, take a look at this thread: Four Ways to Die - Why the Tank Meta Feels "Off". The gist is that in a world where the biggest threat to your survival comes in the form of a single, highly-predictable period of high incoming damage, the value of passive survival is greatly diminished. Now, this is changed slightly in Midas (that thread was written during Gordias), but it is still considered best practice for tanks to get "enough" mitigation to survive the tankbusters, and then focus on maximizing damage output--there simply isn't a great enough need for extra survivability beyond that point.
It would feel good to need to be un-killable, but the game would need to take a big shift for that to happen.



Reply With Quote



