Players Who Don't pull their weight.

[Sipherous]

Cause 1000 limit is a pain.

I wasn't expecting the WAR to facplant honestly, took me a few sec to even realize he was dead. Once I noticed I switched oaths while provoking and ur DPS lead was quite a bit higher than everyone else I think it took a full halone combo just to get it off you cause i provoked to early. was rewatching the video. Normally if u Mting u know u have to pop a major CD at that part or the auto attack kills you you immediately. Kind of a cheap trick by SE in my opinion. The Tank as annoying me anyways kept runnign around all crazy like XD

[DarkmoonVael]

Giving 100% is using all of your skills to their maximum effect. Putting balance on a healer instead of one of the dps is only 80-85% at best.

Not when you get very bad DF dps who are pulling lower dps than the AST.

Also it was a joke, i thought that may have been a bit obvious........

[Mahri]

Good god almighty, is this still going?

Please see post no. 2. Get over it, you won't change it.

[Slirith]

If you can't pull your weight and give 100%, don't queue for anything. Group's time>yours

[alimdia]

For now just keep kicking them and if the majority of the party is not doing anything then just leave.

[KarstenS]

Sadly you forget this is a game for a lot of people not a way of life.

There is a difference between a single player game and a multi player game. The difference is: in a multiplayer game you play together with others. Similar to games you play in teams in real life, the others in your team do expect that everybody is trying to do its best and to get better.´

In real life games, leeching is no option, when you want to play that game and not to sit outside and watch how the others do play.

[Rytank]

SE let's just junk the commend system, and make a 1-5* rating system. When you finish a dungeon players rate your progress witch is then averaged by role. Then when starting any content b4 play begins you see everybody's rating and can choose to stay or go without penalty. Q's might take a little longer but, hey at least then we know what we're signing up for.

[Rytank]

SE let's just junk the commend system, and make a 1-5* rating system. When you finish a dungeon players rate your progress witch is then averaged by role. Then when starting any content b4 play begins you see everybody's rating and can choose to stay or go without penalty. Q's might take a little longer but, hey at least then we know what we're signing up for.

[Mattelot]

SE let's just junk the commend system, and make a 1-5* rating system. When you finish a dungeon players rate your progress witch is then averaged by role. Then when starting any content b4 play begins you see everybody's rating and can choose to stay or go without penalty. Q's might take a little longer but, hey at least then we know what we're signing up for.

The problem with systems like that is they create stigma that can cause someone difficulty to remove. There are a lot of elitists in this game who will abuse the system and give a 1 to anyone who doesn't play to their standards. Others would see a lower score and it will give the illusion that they're not capable when they're more than capable but may not necessarily be the creme-of-the-crop.

[Alistaire]

I'd certainly give a 1 to a healer that doesn't dps, and brags about it in his forum sig.