Please. Water is a case of life and death. A house on FF14 is a luxury. The morality of these two situations is not even remotely comparable.
Please. Water is a case of life and death. A house on FF14 is a luxury. The morality of these two situations is not even remotely comparable.
I never mentioned anything about life and death. I was suggesting a far-fetched albeit hypothetical case where one reservoir that's used to supply homes with water dries up and people are forced to commute to a city or wherever for bottled water. If one person owned a reservoir or lake that miraculously managed to escape the same consequences of the season then it'd cost the owner nothing to allow the locals to use it for whatever purposes. It was an implied abuse about profiting upon an inconvenience, not a potential disaster. Over-analysing it is just a silly excuse to avoid the point I was making. There are a thousand other better analogies you could come up with if it suited you but I figured people would manage to work the fundamental point out regardless.
In any case, I'm sorry I was unclear.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.