These glamours should fit all genders. SE should remove gender restrictions from equipment (maybe except underwear, haha). It's sad to see that I can wear Best Man suit, for example, but the Bride maid's set cannot be equipped by male characters.


These glamours should fit all genders. SE should remove gender restrictions from equipment (maybe except underwear, haha). It's sad to see that I can wear Best Man suit, for example, but the Bride maid's set cannot be equipped by male characters.



We should put a link here as well really so it can be read and liked by others who are interested. A question was asked in the official Letter from the Producer LIVE thread asking for some clarification on whether people with male characters can expect the same number of glamours as those with female characters in future:
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...=1#post3372118
I hope they answer it (in the affirmative, preferably).
omg! please stop it people what are you doing T.T
That listing makes it look as though the Gambler's set and the original bunny set are related. Their only relation is the fact that both were released when the Gold Saucer itself released (which is also true of the Riviera and Oasis ones). There was never any association of the Gamblers set with males. There was simply one set for everyone, a couple partial sets with male and female counterparts, and one fully female set with no counterpart.So I've been working on this :P All the Gender locked gear sets and their equivalents and where equivalents are Unisex or not.
Gold Saucer Gear
(disparities!)
♀ Female :::::::::::::::::::::::: ♂ Male
♀ Bunny Crown / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
♀ Bunny Bustier / Gambler's Trenchcoat (Unisex)
♀ Bunny Loops / Gambler's Gloves (Unisex)
♀ Bunny Tights / Gambler's Trousers (Unisex)
♀ Bunny Pumps / Gambler's Boots (Unisex)
♀ Riviera Dress / ♂ Riviera Doublet
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / ♂ Riviera Slops
♀ Oasis Tunic / ♂ Oasis Doublet
♀ Oasis Sarouels / ♂ Oasis Halftrews
3.1 Items
♀ Bunny Chief Crown / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
♀ Bunny Chief Bustier / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
♀ Bunny Chief Loops / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
♀ Bunny Chief Tights / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
♀ Bunny Chief Pumps / xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Sorry, but you are incorrect from their first reveal. http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...-gender-lockedThat listing makes it look as though the Gambler's set and the original bunny set are related. Their only relation is the fact that both were released when the Gold Saucer itself released (which is also true of the Riviera and Oasis ones). There was never any association of the Gamblers set with males. There was simply one set for everyone, a couple partial sets with male and female counterparts, and one fully female set with no counterpart.
Players had speculated about whether it might be gender locked. That's different than it being designed to be gender locked. (And wasn't there also an early concept art pic of it that showed it on a female Roe?)Sorry, but you are incorrect from their first reveal. http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...-gender-locked
That's the only good one, the rest are cringe-worthy
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.
Reply With Quote






